Your Voice Counts
Welcome to "Your Voice Counts" – the Boxer Updates feedback page. Here you can read what Californians are saying in response to my recent messages on issues facing Congress and the nation. If you would like to join the conversation, please click here. To browse past Boxer Updates, please click here.
Marriage Equality
Californians respond to my message on Supporting Marriage Equality:Thank you for your enthusiastic and immediate positive response to what the President had to say today about marriage between two men and/or two women. Our family appreciated the promptness and enthusiasm of your comments! Marion, mother of lesbian daughter and two other daughters…
Marion, Oakland
I thank you -both for your support of equality, and for deeming President Obama's new stance on marriage equality worthy of sending an outreach message. Those of us who are continually marginalized and made to feel less-than-human by bigotry and intolerance truly appreciate your work on our behalf. Please know that you have our full support as well as our thanks.
Charles, Oceanside
Thank you for sending this message about marriage equality. My wife and I are both pleased that this country is recognizing that God indeed loves all people. It's time that our laws reflect this.
David, Santa Barbara
I am completely with you I am proud of you and the President I am a proud Californian (despite our insane budget issues which we have to fix...) I am a heterosexual married woman with 3 children from Philadelphia, so not historically “SF / everything weird you could say” person, but I couldn't be more proud, more happy and more at home than here...in SF, in CA, with Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein representing me and paving a golden path for my children.
Anne, San Francisco
Obviously our president has not read let along studied God's word on marriage. Hopefully their is a Bible in or near your office. Sincerely,
Howard, Los Gatos
Thank you Dear President Obama! You have given me the best and most Precious Gift a Mother could ever receive on Mother's Day! The President has "Come Out" and said, my Gay Daughter too, should be equal to her brother and sister. Now she too, should be given the right to marry the woman she loves. We can all be a Respectful Family and Accepted by everyone in this Great and Free Country At Last. Thank you Senator Boxer for your great work and bringing this message to all of us. I am so proud of you! Sincerely,
Beverly, San Clemente
Thank you for supporting equal rights for all. I am nearly 61 years old and I am appalled by the lack of progress for equal rights. In America we seem to find another to discriminate against once we "accept" a group. If we truly believe that we are one nation, and all have equal rights, we must stop making laws to discriminate. That includes prohibiting gays from marrying the one they love. That includes demanding papers from people in Arizona that appear to be illegal immigrants. I am a mix of European ancestry, and as a child I was taught America is the melting pot. I was proud to be American. Now I am troubled that we seem to be regressing. All people are equal and entitled to equal rights. If America is to be a world leader, we must live that.
Christine, Ramona
Since California already allows "Civil Unions" for same sex, why not just apply all of the same legal rights as "Marriage" to "Civil Unions" and satisfy both sides. It would be a win-win. Each state has this control. Unless the idea is not about the legal issues at all and more about trying to destroy the Churches belief's.
Ronald, Santa Barbara
Thank you for supporting Marriage Equality and taking the steps to end discrimination of same sex couples and families. Each member of my family believes same sex couples deserve to have the same rights my family takes for granted.
Donna, Los Angeles
Thank YOU for your support that has never waivered! My partner and I are still awaiting the change to federal laws that will allow her to share in my federal retirement and health benefits. As a couple, we have made a home for 4 foster/adoptive children (youngest is 13), and we see ourselves as very much a mainstream family.
Jeane, San Francisco
This aging, straight couple is happy that our President came out in favor of marriage for the LGBT group of citizens. We are acquainted with more than one gay couple in a long, committed, relationship and have thought and talked about their situation long and hard over the years. NOW we have to do all we can to support those who agree with us, and work to damp down the flare of opposition that must not become a conflagration in this country. Sincerely,
Jan, Palo Alto
It is a travesty that rights have been denied to good families. It is even more horrible that this inequality has found support in our government because of religious ideology. Is the first amendment that easily forgotten? It is about time a president does what he promised when taking office, upholding the constitution. Thank you again John (straight and a fervent supporter of same sex marriage)
John, Westminster
I suggest that you and your associates get serious about exposing the almost Kamikaze tactics of the Republicans. Somehow they, the Republicans, have forgotten that this is a country 'for all the people,' not just some of the people. The average voter has to forcibly be made aware of how they are slowly destroying all that is good in this country. I'm 79, so I don't have that much to worry about. But what about the average American? Respectfully,
Morris, West Hollywood
Thanks for all of your continued support as it is very much appreciated. I am proud today to be an American and have my President come out in support of my family.
Mardee, Redwood City
How about working hard to improve the economic problems of our country and stop running business out of the state of California and leave personal preferences to individuals. Respectfully yours
Jerry, Venice
What I want to ask people who are against same sex marriage is, "how does this affect your marriage"? My husband and I will be married fifty-five years in August and we have many friends who just happen to be gay. That is NOT something they chose but that is how they are. Denying them the same rights I have is totally ridiculous! Congratulations, Mr. President!
Barbara, La Quinta
The President's final "evolution" is a great step forward. But his inclusive approach to marriage rights can only take effect through the passing of a Constitutional amendment from Congress, since clearly the current Supreme Court will not overturn the states' discriminatory legislation denying equal rights to LGBT couples. Until Congress sees fit to respect the words set down by our Founders, millions of Americans will be unable to take advantage of the President's honorable and long-hoped-for position.
Joseph, Beverly Hills
I believe that the word 'Marriage' was meant to be used to represent the joining of a "Man and a Woman" in "Holy Matrimony". The desires of two people of the 'Same Sex' to be joined together "Legally" as couple, wishing it to be known that they are committing themselves to each other, should be known as something such as a 'Civil Union' or a 'Committed Unity', etc...
Kenneth, Santa Barbara
Congratulations to us all! So thrilled about the president's support of everyone's rights! Thank you for all that YOU do, too.
Jacqueline, Simi Valley
Dear President Obama, I know this pronouncement will bring you lots of flack and backlash, but it was the right thing to do. I'm proud of you, and particularly that you stated your position knowing of all the negative repercussions inherent in the action. You had my vote anyway, but now it's an even more righteous vote in every way. And, yes, I'm straight, but I do not feel that anyone's sexual orientation is my or anyone's business. My God's love is inclusive, not exclusive. It's the right think to do. Thank you.
Jaci, Long Beach
President Obama showed great sensitivity, courage and heart in making his announcement today. It is a victory for civil rights and for all Americans. We are indeed proud.
Robert, Rolling Hills Estates
I was encouraged by the position expressed by President Obama. I would ask that you assist the President by getting his word out to your colleagues to promote civil rights to all Americans.
Jack, Montebello
Your positions are always for the people of CA and represent all the people. I am so happy that President Obama gave his support to the rights of all Americans to be able to pursue happiness, however that might be represented.
Patricia, Santa Barbara
Thank you for joining our President and for continuing your support not just on this issue but on issues that support the rights and liberties of ALL of our citizens. The vitriol that seems to be dominating our Senate of late is heartbreaking and speaks to all things that are NOT what this country is about. Please continue to stand up, speak up, and meet the challenges that our wonderful country is facing. As the cliché goes, we "got your back!"
Bonnie, Santa Barbara
Thank you for your email supporting President Barack Obama's message about supporting marraige equality for all people. This is one of the reasons I am a Democrat and not a Republican. I am happy that the Democratic Party is finally standing up for something rather that retreating and allowing the Republicans to define the issues. All the Republicans have in their pocket at this time is the politics of fear. I listened to the right wing arguments against marriage equality this morning on an NPR program and all the arguments are so weak it is laughable. That is why they need to rely on fear. Don't let them succeed at that! I have often been frustrated by the Democratic Party's seeming lack of spine on some of these issues. This is a refreshing change.
Maura, Concord
Thank you for voicing your support of the President's backing of marriage equality! Also, thank you for calling it what it is: marriage equality, instead of simply "gay marriage." :)
Gary, San Diego
It's time for marriage equality and we deserve for all Americans. It's so many years overdue. And removing the curse of our armed forces in charge to accept all soldiers whether they are straight, or ar GLBT. We are all human beings, should be treated as such, as well as receiving benefits of being a dependant of a servicemember, or the servicemember having a dependant who is same sex. My dad listened to me his entire 30 years as a test pilot, a command officer, and treating his troops regardless of their sexual orientation. Lots of times I brought a loved one home for dinner who has been serving under my father, without any negative feelings or drawbacks. I personally taught him this respect even before service leaders were suppose to attend a diversity training seminar. That's why my father will be remembered forever for treating his troops, no matter what command he held at the time, respect for all people.
Taho, San Diego
While I'm certainly happy that the President has come around to FINALLY declaring that he is for marriage equality, this is a non-issue for me (and most everyone I know). People should already be treated fairly and be allowed to marry whomever they desire. I hope that the President, the Congress and the media can get over it soon and get back to more pressing national issues. For instance immigration reform, tax reform, and ensuring steady economic growth. Finally, thanks for being a great Senator!
Damien, San Francisco
I am very happy that President Obama has publicly stated that he supports marriage equality. I think it is long overdue and glad that he decided to damn the political risk and stand up for what's right. Sincerely,
Deborah, San Francisco
President Obama took a courageous stand in support of same sex marriage. No doubt this decision will receive a tremendous amount of attention in the coming months, not all positive. Thank you too, Sen Boxer for being such a loyal supporter of marriage equality. You have also faced much scorn and criticism for your willingness to stand up for equal rights.
Pat, Lakewood
I believe you go a bit overboard when stating "none of us can rest" until marriage equality is a reality for all Americans. As U.S. Senator, you must have more pressing concerns regarding the Americans you serve. Just hoping you have enough hours in a workday to deal with problems facing ALL Americans. Thanks for listening.
Mark, San Francisco
Thank you for your message today celebrating President Obama's voiced support of marriage equality. This is a very important day indeed, for us personally as a married couple in California and for us as a nation. Thank you,
David & Richard, Berkeley
If I was gay, I would want the same rights as anyone else. Those people who are against equality need to step outside themselves once in a while and try to imagine themselves in that position before deciding what is just and what isn't.
Janis, San Rafael
Thank you for sharing this fantastic news. As a gay man, I look forward to the day when I can marry my domestic partner and share all the marriage benefits that straight married couples enjoy today. This is a very bold move by President Obama. Please relay my thanks and appreciation.
Steven, Emeryville
Thank you for supporting equal rights for all citizens. You give respect to all citizens! It is a thrill to see that my daughter Mariflo and her wife Katie who were blessed in a Christian ceremony at their Methodist Church as well as by the state of CA during the period that their marriage was "legal" now have the support of President Obama. They have 3 children. Their oldest gave a speech on Harvey Milk Day about having two moms. She closed her speech by asking the students to raise their hands if they wanted their families respected. When all hands were waving in the air, she said,"That's all that any kid wants."
Florence, Irvine
Thank you for your message and support for marriage equality. I feel strongly that gays and lesbians deserve full equality under the law and urge you to continue your good work.
Shyrl, San Rafael
As a gay man, I am offended by the President's phony attempt at supporting gay marriage. It is transparent and insultingly political. It is designed to distract us from the real important issues and it panders to a group who largely vote only on their own selfish issues. I, for one, am not fooled amd I do not think Harvey Milk would be either. What the President did was agregious. President Obama gave his opinion, if one chooses to believe it.That is all he did. Now the left media will act like it was a proclamation. Nothing changes because of it.
Ben, Santa Monica
It is often argued, by those who oppose amendments like North Carolina's, that to protect marriage is to persecute homosexuals. But at the root of that contention is an illogical assumption: that you can?t be ?for? marriage unless you?re ?against? homosexuals. That is simply not true. My support for traditional marriage is not rooted in distaste or dislike for anyone. The social science confirms that the most stabilizing and enriching environment a child can grow up in is a home headed by his or her married mother and father. And since the health of any society depends on the health of those who comprise it, it is the responsibility of government to enact laws that offer the best chance for health to be passed from one generation to the next. Traditional marriage is that best chance of creating a building block for a thriving society. Not same sex marriage! I am disappointed in you and Obama!!!
Diane, West Hollywood
Thank you! We have sent President Obama a message in full support.
Maggie and Stephen, Oakland
Back to top
Home Refinancing Legislation
Californians respond to my message on Helping Responsible Homeowners to Refinance: I support all your efforts to make it easier for people to refinance their mortgages at lower interest rates. This is badly needed by many. I encourage you to stress this message to your colleagues from other states -- needed in all states! Having spoken with a relative in Ct., I learned how difficult the process can be and also how much misinformation is given to people trying to refinance their mtge. Thank you for all you good work!
Margaret, Ventura
Thank you, Senator Boxer, for your always fair minded, good-hearted activity in response to the predicaments of actual human citizens, in this case, home buyers.
Mary, Crescent City
i hope this bill helps,but some people dont fit in the area this bill covers. we paid $139,000. for house in 2008 now it is worth only $99,000. we dont qualify for refi. we are 1 payment behind, and get calls often several times a day from bank wanting payment. no, they do not offer any assistance,just are very nasty, and snippy, wanting past due house payment. soo how will this bill help us again????
Joann, Visalia
Mortgage refinance assistance should be extended to all mortgages and not only those through Fannie & Freddie. Some banks have kept mortgage loans for their most creditworthy customers in-house and did not transfer them to Fannie or Freddie. This means that people who have done the best job of managing their credit & finances will not be able to refinance their loans. Is this equitable?
Douglas, La Quinta
I find that getting the investors to go along with the programs is hard the part. There are so many overlays to programs that the number of people actually refinancing is low compared to the total loan count. Whatever you can do to help the people would be appreciated.
Alan, Riverside
I really think this legislation is extremely important. The banks are not helping people at all. What are the chances of this actually passing when the Republicans still block anything that President Obama asks for? Thank you for your efforts.
Kathie, Simi Valley
As a real estate appraiser of 50 years in Bakersfield, I am becoming very concerned over the manipulation of the market by governmental forces. Our supply of housing is at critical levels which is driving prices higher to a point of limited affordability for the persons in need of housing. The repressive policies of FHA and the GSE's are hindering the free market forces. I call upon you to immediately pressure the GSE's and banks that are hold toxic assets in the form of REO's to start releasing them to the open market, thereby curbing the start of another "housing bubble". Investors are now dominating our market and preventing buyers from obtaining affordable housing.
Gary, Bakersfield
Nobody has the right to own a home...it is a privilege earned through having good credit, a sizable down payment and secure work history. If you didn't possess these items, you shouldn't have been able to purchase a home. Furthermore, no restrictions should be placed on those investors that provide liquidity to the housing market in their efforts to resell properties that they purchase.
Douglas, Camarillo
Interest correlates with Inflation, why am I or the subsidized part of my loan paying twice the amount everyone else is. Property value is the issue with the refinance. Make special loans TO THE PEOPLE to make their negotiations with the banks, not the bank to deny all the homeowners. I put cash down, what did they give? Billion dollar question
JoAnne, Ventura
Why is this only for Freddie and Fannie borrowers?? Why not include Chase loans and others that need that kind of help as well?
Robyn, Visalia
Your email concerning the housing crisis is real. The idea that you will take care of these issues are commendable. However it to late. I know of many people that have lost their homes because that could not get a modtification of their home loan. It is like shutting the gate after the horses have gotten out. Please know, I hope you can "do" something. Respecfully Submitted,
Bob, Riverside
People like me who have a mortgage signed a contract to pay it back with interest. If they don't like the interest they agree to they can refinance at a new rate. If the value of there home has lowered that should pay there payments at they rate they agreed to and wait for the market to come back. The key is that they signed a contract and should honer there word to abide by it. Its not the job of the federal gov. to get involved in privet agreements . YOU are undermining personal responsibility.
David, Bakersfield
It's too late to do anything for us. Because of the refi 'stiffness' and inflexability, we have already lost our home and are living in an R.V. not the picture of our future we saw for our older age. The economy in Southern California, as well as the whole state is in such shambles, we lost our savings, retirement and home of 28 years. We've moved on and are trying to start all over. OUT of California! It saddens us, to be sure.
William, Hesperia
I see all this as nothing more than a bailout of another group that was irresponsible in handling their finances. Is anyone ever responsible for their own actions in modern America? The people that act responsibly and do not live beyond their means are once again called to pull the irresponsible out of the fire.
Robert, Thousand Oaks
Back to top
Student Loans
Californians respond to Republicans Block Bill to Protect Students from Rate Hike: I have several student loans. I needed them to become a teacher of students with special needs. I was told that I would receive a loan forgiveness of $17,500 after 5 years of teaching. I have been given the run around for four years and have yet to receive my loan forgiveness. Now, my interest rates will double. I love my teaching job, and I thank you for trying to stick up for students who have stifling loan debt. I would have stayed a special education assistant if I had known that my loan debt will take my life time to pay back. Thank you for trying,
Mary, Mission Hills
Our grandson is a student at San Jose State College. Because of a school policy, he must live in a dorm for the first year because he graduated from a high school that is more than 30 miles from San Jose. His dad graduated with honors from UC Berkeley and has a Master's Degree from University of San Francisco. He works as an environmental health specialist for the Hayward Fire Department. In spite of his college degrees he has had to take out loans, with his son, to pay for the costs of college. I am outraged that the Republicans in Congress have voted against a bill that would bring some reason to the high cost of loans. Next year, our grandson will be living with us in Fremont, but there will still be costs associated with school that his parents will not be able to pay for without help. I hope you will continue your work to try to bring some sense to the table.
Deloris, Fremont
Don't increase interest on student loans. It is such a burden and follows you forever. What if you don't make the kind of money you'd hoped to make? Should you be punished forever?
Ann, Santa Barbara
All well and good concerning the loan raises but how about all the students who haven't or will not pay on their 3.4% loans now. How are you going to collect from them? I know of one who has a big one and will never pay it back. It's another free handout.
Robert, Santa Rosa
The Republicans can't seem to find a low enough level to which they will stoop, day after day, week after week (not counting the weeks of breaks they have scheduled for themselves on full pay and full benefits while doing no work). It is outrageous that the Republican leadership would choose to sacrifice the futures of our young people and our next generation of leaders by doubling their debt - something which Republicans claim to detest - unless it serves their obstructionist agenda. They are simply cynical hypocrites and have no shame.
Pat, Sacramento
The failure to keep loan interest from increasing in July may turn out to be beneficial in the long run. Huge numbers of graduates are trying to deal with burdensome debt acquired as students. The increasing number of graduates considering bankruptcy is jeopardizing their careers and will impact the economy. If the interest rate increases, perhaps more students will select alternatives and strive to find part time work for support rather than depending upon loans. Many students DO work their way through college. Time to "man up."
James, Torrance
Back to top
GI Bill Scams
Californians respond to my message on Protecting Veterans from Deceptive Marketing:Senator, want to thank you for supporting veterans like myself and millions around the U.S. who are struggling to find jobs and then come across websites pitching jobs and schooling for a profit. I have gotten numerous emails from bogus websites claiming to want to help veterans, but leave out the part where we have to fork over money for their services. Please continue supporting us and may God bless you and your family.
Juan, Long Beach
What a sensical idea, I'm surprised it hadn't been done before and by the way thank you very much for your action in getting this implemented. I'm always amazed at the number of false claims made in this country by everyone. I sincerely thank you;
David, Sacramento
Back to top
Violence Against Women Act
Californians respond to my message on Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Thank you for fighting for the Violence Against Women Act. One step at a time has brought us far, but women still have a long way to go toward gender parity, security, and respect.
Leila, Loomis
Thank you very much for supporting the Violence Against Women Bill. I appreciate your passion on this issue.
Joan, Hayward
I just watched your comments concerning this act and I wanted to applaud your words, your intention and your passion. This is so important and I am proud to know that there is someone like you who represents my interests in the Senate. Please keep up the good work. And thank you for all you do.
Jan, Oxnard
This is certainly an action, alas like so many, which should have been taken much sooner but thank goodness it is being taken. One doesn't hope anymore, when it comes to positive and -- heaven forbid -- "progressive" action being taken by Congress, which seems to be running at least 50 years behind the times, but please know your hard work and firm stands are much appreciated. Would there were more, many more, in our government like you!
Victoria, San Pedro
Thank you for being so instrumental in the passage of VAWA. We do not often get a chance to show our appreciation for the work you do, but almost always we find ourselves in complete agreement with the positions you take.
Emilios, El Cerrito
Back to top
Armenian Genocide
Californians respond to my message on Commemorating the Armenian Genocide: Thank you for all that you have contributed to the Cause. I appreciate your work on behalf of my grandparents, my uncle and my aunt who lost their lives during the horrible genocide. God bless you. Sincerely,
Adrena, Sebastopol
I was born in 1954 and this is the first time I have heard about the Armenian Genocide. I am not of Armenian descent. I strongly support international human rights and the acknowledgement of genocide as a means of honoring those who suffered these atrocities and as a means of carrying that knowledge forward as a lesson to prevent future atrocities. THANK YOU and your fellow Senators for taking a stand for this important issue. Sincerely,
Jane, Mountain View
Thank you so much for taking your precious time and energy to set the record straight on the Armenian Genocide. No one appears to be brave enough, or feel it is important to take action on this terrible time in history. Not even one person should ever be killed and tortured as my ancestors were in the name of religion and culture. More than one million Armenians, Pontic Greeks, and Assyrians were all slaughtered painfully by the Turkish Ottoman Empire. My ancestry is all three and have lost much of my descendants due to the Turks massacres. Please put an end to this crime.
Lynn, Novato
I just got a chance to read your letter regarding Armenian Genocide. I want to take this time and say THANK YOU. Sincerely,
Alexi, Van Nuys
Back to top
Contractor Pay
Californians respond to my message on Limiting Taxpayer-Funded Salaries for Private Contractors:At this moment in our history, the increase you speak of in the recent Email sent to me is absolutely scandalous. You have my support and encouragement to limit such an automatic increase for federal contractor salaries. Thank you for taking a strong position on this matter.
John, Healdsburg
I applaud your efforts to reduce government contractor compensation. It makes good fiscal sense. Please continue your work to curb out-of-control federal spending.
Gerry, Santa Clara
I totally agree with you: it's outrageous that those contractors get a big raise in our present state of national economic hardship. I am with you on nixing those laws that permit this to happen. Sincerely,
Robert, Encinitas
I fully agree with the bill you are promoting with Charles Grassley to limit pay for government contractors. The present numbers seem outrageous!
David, San Leandro
I think it is time to rethink the whole issue of out sourcing, particularly in the military. From what I read there is much false economy.
John, San Francisco
As congress is fighting to limit benefits of social security/medicare for average american citizens struggling while at the same time allowing pay raises to Private contractors/corporations... is a Gross miss-justice to the American People. It has become nothing but serving the private interest of Corporations on backs of Taxpayers who get nothing in return. Please stop this Gross Miss-Justice, as it continues to erode away our democracy for the interest of a few. Sincerely,
Roxanna, Petaluma
Well done...and so logical! I am glad to call you my representative in Congress.
Tawna, Ross
Thank you for your continued efforts to reign in misuse of taxpayer money while still being attentive to those who are truly in need. Sincerely,
Sr. Angela, Montebello
More than a cap on contractors, those who oversee contracts should know they will be immediately fired if they do not oversee and not allow fraud. No excuse--Overseer is the job description. They should not have to oversee too many contracts so they have the time to do a good job.
Nancy, Los Angeles
I thought the whole reason for the existence of contractors was the theory that they would cost less than a government employee. I think the pay for contractors should be capped at no more than 90% of the cost of hiring a government worker.
Richard, San Jose
Thank you for your efforts to keep the costs under control. It is outrageous that in these lean times (I've been underemployed & unemployed for the past 3 yrs.) some are trying to unfairly take advantage of our tax dollars to line their own pockets, and the pockets of their contractor friends! Thank you for being a watchdog for us all!
Margaret, Carpinteria
It is outrageous to be paying these huge salaries. I believe these salaries should be in line with or less than teachers salaries. I am a retired contractor (building), and can tell you that most contractors are schemers and will always lie about the true cost of things so to line their pockets. These huge salary earners are skimming and scheming their way to the 1%. Great place to start, but , they need to be cut WAY more.
Dean, Cathedral City
Well, now, my taxes are helping to pay the salary of private contractors to the tune of something over $700K, mostly likely a year. Well, now ain't that just ducky. Lets see here now, in the past three years I and other pensioners didn't get COLA raise due to an economic situation that was partly caused by financial mismanagement by private contractors, et al. This year we all got a 3.4% increase. Woohoo. In the meantime these PC's are going to get an increase of $70K. I can't believe that we all voted somewhere down the line to allow this to happen. Shame on us for 10 minutes. No, make it 15 min. And shame, shame, shame on the Congress for letting it get thru.
David, Vacaville
I completely support and agree with your vote against increasing, by any percentage, taxpayer funding of salaries for independent contractors. We are being robbed blind by the Republicans and their cronies. You are serving us well and I appreciate your service as our Senator.
Jan, Cambria
Back to top
Fort Ord
Californians respond to my message on Designating a National Monument at Fort Ord:(NEW) I know that you were heavily involved in the effort to get Fort Ord preserved and I want to thank you and congratulate you on the fulfillment of this effort. As a life time resident of the Monterey Bay Area, this is a huge source of pride, akin to the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Fishermans Wharf. You just added a major jewel to the crown of this area. With much appreciation,
Rick, Santa Cruz
I am delighted to hear about the National Monument designation and the nearly 15,000 acres at Fort Ord. I spent over 4 years there in the mid-to-late 1970's and those times remain in memory as some of the best of my life. Thank you for the work you put in to accomplish this.
Helene, Bonsall
Frank, Buellton
Fort Ord a great idea i was stationed at Fort Ord for basic training, i learned the basics (1959) had a ball. Happy Trails,
Chief Joseph, Valley Springs
Thank you for preserving some of the most wonderful parts of the California coast. What a win: 15,000 acres. Bravo!!
Susan, Sausalito
I have fond memories of the Fort. My older brother seved out his basic training with the Army at Fort Ord. As a little boy, I got to see a little of the Army life. I look forward to walking in and around that area of California and enjoying the wonderful coast line and fresh air that part of California has to offer.
Ronald, Victorville
No! though I served there, i see no reason to glorify war. Beside the civil war, I find it ludicrous to believe our military actually has deployed to protect our rights. More likely, our military fights to stimulate industries.
Allen, Napa
How can Obama designate that land when he probably does not know how obscure decent shopping facilites are in this area. And, why do they need all of the land? it is very nice that we have a place to ride our horses, if you have one, but no place to shop for groceries. I know, that since I am a conservative, you do not care about my opinion.
Ilene, Salinas
preserving Ft ord was a wonderful idea. thank you and President Obama
Flurry, San Diego
I am so grateful you are my Senator and I'm particularly grateful that you were a major influence in Fort Ord becoming a National Monument. Sincerely yours,
Frances, Capitola
The recent 15,000 acre National Monument designation in California is welcome news indeed! It's great to hear about progress on the environmental front. Thank you for all your hard work.
Soraya, Van Nuys
Thank you for your support of protection for vital open space in California as exemplified by your support for the designation of Fort Ord NM. I hope enough operating funds will be appropriated to make the designation more than a paper gesture.
Helen, La Jolla
Back to top
Earth Day
Californians respond to my message on Earth Day 2012: Thank you, Senator Boxer, for your excellent and on-point message concerning the changes that the message and observance of Earth Day have wrought for the better in air and water quality and in the stewardship we owe to the earth that has been entrusted to us by the Creator. I do so appreciate that you advocate for these necessary issues and that you do so articulately and with both your own constituents and a greater audience at your heart.
Mary, Claremont
Please continue your commitment to defend any environmental issues that may come under attack by anyone, especially the Republican party. There is no acceptable reason to repeal any environmental laws that protect our and our children's health. Common sense tells us that our quality of life depends on good health. No amount of money can replace a healthy body. I trust you will be our watchdog in Washington D.C. on this critical issue.
Dennis, Torrance
Although the goal is noble, often the implementations Environmental Protection Agency leave a lot to be desired. The EPA often fails to factor human costs into its decisions, depriving many people of their property and livelihoods. Many people who live and work in rural lands have had the EPA run rough-shod over their lives. These are the very people whose products feed and house the nation. I would urge you to support reforms to the agency and its procedures that require it to work toward solutions that not only improve the environment, but also factor in the needs of the people often caught in the way.
Catherine, Felton
As one of your Southern California constituents, I applaud your efforts to maintain and enforce the necessary environmental laws of our federal government enacted since the first earth day. I also encourage you to do all you can to persuade your senatorial colleagues on both sides of the aisle to reasonably expand environmental safeguard nationwide. For example, the Keystone pipeline potentially constitutes an environmental threat greater than the Gulf oil spill of two years ago. Therefore, any new industrial/economic initiatives (while necessary and potentially good) need to be weighed against their real and potential harms on the habitats they impact. Strengthening and backing the EPA, for example, is a smart way to protect all Americans (and all people on earth). Please continue your good work. You have my support in your efforts.
Marc, Pasadena
We need more champions for the environment like you. I know this is a difficult time to be working in Congress when you're up against a party whose goal it is to thwart progress at all costs to the American people, and as you said, our earth and the air we breathe. California is proud to have YOU representing us, defending our people and our sacred planet. Happy Earth Day! Thank you for all you do.
Elaine, Berkeley
Please keep up the good work and keep the Republicans from rolling back environmental protection laws. Please also remember that the environment needs water, and please keep the agricultural interests in California from taking it away from environmental needs. Sincerely,
Dan, Huntington Beach
I just want to say thank you for putting the environment first. Too many people seem to have forgotten how bad things were in the 50's, 60's and even when I was a child in the 70's. I appreciate you reminding your constituents in your Earth Day message and encourage you to find ways to take that information to the general public. More folks need to know, or be reminded, of burning river (by the way, the fires began decades earlier, the 1969 fire was just the last one), Love Canal, cancer clusters, black smoke pouring from smoke stacks, and even the smog that was covering the Grand Canyon. These are the stories I told my Hazardous Waste students to help them understand WHY these rules had come about. I have to believe that if the general population was better informed, many would come around also. Thanks again,
Channon, Rancho Palos Verdes
Thanks for your Earth Day message and for all you do to preserve our environmental regulatory framework, including the EPA, the CAA, the CWA the SDWA and the Superfund.
Mark, La Jolla
I am also fearful of Republicans undoing all the hard work Congress and concerned citizens have done to make our environment safer and more liveable. Please keep up the good fight for clean air, water, and the environment in Congress. I remember back in the 1970s when smog completely obscured the mountains from view during the summer months in southern California, school children could not go outside to play during recess, and the beaches were not safe because the water was contaminated. Please help protect our beautiful state.
Gloria, Torrance
Thank you for continuing to fight for the environmental protections we have fought so hard for over the past decades! Our grandchildren and great grandchildren will benefit!!! These are NOT luxuries we can afford to discard. They are necessities. I for one cannot believe we are back to the place where we have to justify why these protections are necessary. Weren't any of these Republicans breathing the air and drinking the water back in the 60s and 70s? I was! And I don't want to go back there!
Robert, Fallbrook
We all appreciate your tremendous efforts to safe guard our environment, not only for health reasons but for all life! Hopefully someday the conservativeness of the Republicans & politics in general will once again be balanced to preserve and protect instead of the fear based greed of industry. Thank you so much for being courageous in the face of pressure & ignorance that is so self serving; yet the irony is we all breath air, drink water and eat food! Keep up the good work.
Linda, Cardiff
Please send me the names of those who oppose to breathing clear air and drinking clean water and i will take personal interest removing them from Congressional office. They need to understand that what God has made should not be contaminated by our means. Thank you for bring this to our attention.
Ronald, Pomona
I agree we have made great strides in improving the air we breathe and such. Your email states that you can't understand why Congressional Republicans want to undermine all of that. This is the problem. Whether it's your side trying to squelch business by continued stiffening regulations, which costs all of us by running up the costs of fuel, goods, loss of jobs, etc. or the Republican side that goes way the other way, by letting big corporations get away with too much. Can't all of you use common sense and come to some middle ground? I know that things are way complicated and none of us really gets the whole story on how things really are, but if we could just trust our elected officials to do the right thing for the greater good and not what's best for their own political career and party, our state, country and world would be a lot better off.
Vivian, Santa Rosa Valley
Our family applauds your hard work and efforts made at maintaining and extending our protections enjoyed under the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and the host of environmental protection legislation passed since 1970. We look to you for providing the leadership needed to take the hard stances needed to defend our global environment, including the Endangered Species Act extensions to include all animals that are in peril of becoming threatened. Likewise, we extend our thanks to you for ensuring that legislation is passed and enforced that protect Native Americans from harm, injustice, poverty, hunger, ill health insufficient education and lack of high-paying jobs that prevent us from living our lives in peace, harmony and balance. Sally, Palos Verdes Estates
Thanks for your work on Environmental Issues. It's amazing to me, how a Republican Congressman can look at their son or daughter and not be frightened with the environmental future.
Jim, Corona
Thank you for your work to preserve the environment, including your work to preserve the Mojave and Desert Hot Springs. Environmental preservation is an important issue for me. Regards,
Martin, Newark
In your latest email to me, you stated: "For the life of me, I can’t understand why Congressional Republican would want to threaten the air we breathe and the water we drink by destroying public health safeguards that prevent premature deaths, children's asthma attacks, and emergency room visits". I want to offer a simple explanation. Nobody wants to go back to 1960's pollution levels. The measures were successful as you pointed out. The problem is that you are now using this organization to forward your personal agenda of the promotion of socialism in this great country. That is what people want to stop. We are now in the midst of the greatest crisis that this country ever faced, and your efforts are adding fuel to this crisis. Thank you for your earnest consideration.
Timothy, San Diego
I remember when California had brilliant sunsets due to air pollution - and days when schools and some businesses in Los Angeles were closed due to smog. Some Republicans want to return to the good old days. This is not my father's Republican Party nor that of Lincoln.
Suzanne, Perris
I notice in your message that you mention that you cannot understand why Congressional Republicans would wish to pollute. Not all Republicans want to pollute, however, there may be occasions in which environmental protection laws may be hindering job growth and business developmental. I am a Republican. I recycle, compost, use CFLs, combine trips & minimize driving. My husband has been a bicycle commuter for over 5 years. I would love to see greater cooperation between Dem's & Repub's on a better balance between both protecting the environment, while making the USA a great place for businesses to thrive. I find your comment to be inflammatory, blaming it all on the Republicans, when the matter is probably more complex than that.
Varena, San Diego
Thank YOU does not fully express how much we appreciate your efforts and diligence throughout the decades in your battles to make our planet a better place for all LIFE. I know I can count on you to represent our voices in continuing to fight the endless battles before us for the health & safety of all concerned--including Mother Earth. Sincerely,
Lorraine, Colfax
Thank you for representing my interests in Congress and for your efforts as Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee to keep our air and water clean. I'm a self-employed writer and teacher living in Los Angeles. Recently, in order to keep from becoming despondent over a temporary lack of work, I made a project of riding my bicycle on 40 different routes all over L.A. county in 40 consecutive days. In that time, I rode 1,099 miles and had a chance to appreciate the incredible natural beauty of the place in which I live. Thank you for helping to keep it that way. Best regards,
Danielle, Los Angeles
What a joke, it is you that is greatly mistaken. Excessive regulations have caused and are causing more problems for the average joe so that nothing gets done and we keep getting hit with more regulations that stop progress cold. The EPA is the biggest boondoggle ever created! You and yor cronies have cause more misery in this country than any one else.
Dirk, Lancaster
I too am for a clean earth. We should all be responsible citizens and protect our enviornment. I belong to or contribute to the National Parks Conservation Assoc, Calif State Parks Foundation, rails-to-trails, and Adventure Cyclists. I AM ALSO A REPUBLICAN. Democrats are not all good people,and Republicans are not all bad. The real debate is to what extent the government should be involved in the issue, and how much will it cost the taxpayer for that involvement.
David, Camarillo
I am responding to your Earth Day message. I just wanted to thank you so much for all you are doing to protect our environment. Keep up the good fight and stay strong in the face of climate/environment opponents. Best,
Jan, Corte Madera
As a Conservative, I value the environment and have donated and been a member of Natural Resource Defense Council for at least 5 years now. We are all trying to make a better environment so let's not target Republicans. Come up with some better solutions that we can all agree upon.
Gloria, Santa Monica
As a life-long Santa Barbara resident, I can still remember the 1969 oil spill of (and on) our shore - the smell, the birds we pulled out and helped clean, the never ending list of pointless excuses from the oil company. Please keep fighting to keep more drilling away from us.
Linda, Santa Barbara
I applaud the work that you are doing to prevent Republicans in Congress from destroying our beautiful planet earth. They should be ashamed of themselves for putting corporate interests (GREED) ahead of the precious lives of U.S. residents.
Marta, Marina Del Rey
Thank you for your message and for working hard to safe-guard our environment. As your constituent, I now ask of you only what you say you will do: remain vigilant! Big oil and big coal will remain vigilant in protecting their interests and their fortunes. We must ensure that greed does not win out over humanity. Please consider, and help congress consider, alternative forms of energy. It's time for this nation to move away from practices which destroy and look for ways to build.
Annie, Castro Valley
I always vote for you for many reasons, but there is nothing more important to me than protecting our precious natural resources that support us in every moment. Thank you for sending the message about Earth Day. That meant a lot to me. I'm glad you continue to fight to protect the earth.
Justine, Guerneville
I feel so relieved that we have you in the Senate. Your diligence in working towards a healthy planet for living creatures from humans to animals alike, is really inspiring.
Lorrie, Los Angeles
The environment issues are the most important and people have come a long way in protecting our natural resources. I do not understand any one that would not care about clean air, water, and the other animal species that live on this planet with us. Keep up the great work! Sincerely,
Gayle, Santa Rosa
Thank you for taking environmental and animal issues to heart since both are voiceless when it comes to their well being unless we as caring, compassionate and responsible human beings work together to make it a better world for all living things.
Paula, Pasadena
Just a note to let you know that you remain our champion and we so appreciate your persistence,and determination in our clean air efforts. The Republicans say no to cleaner air JUST because strong Democrats CARE ! Contrary to any of our good and healthy concerns for the Earth.
Annie, Sonora
The Republicians obviously don't want dirty air and contaminated water. What they want is common sense solutions to our environmental problems. The EPA is out of control with its miriad regulations that now go far and beyond what the Agency and laws were originally intended. Too much power concentrated in the hands of unelected Breaucrats, and not enough oversight by Congress. It is time to work with the Republicians and exchange ideas and find solutions to all our problems.
Patricia, Atascadero
I want to thank you for your continued efforts in environmental care. In general, politics are not something I pay terribly close attention to, but two issues are a constant concern for me: marriage equality and the green movement. Although both appear to be slowly, slowly moving in the right direction, they would be at a standstill without the avid support of political figures such as yourself. Please know that it is noticed (even by those of us who notice little in the governmental arena) and it is hugely, greatly, immensely appreciated. Sincerely,
Kathi, San Diego
Like you, I do not understand why Republicans do not get that our resources are limited and keeping them clean is essential to life on Earth. In my small way, I am trying to decrease my footprint by driving a Prius, growing a small garden, installing solar panels, and changing to LED and CLF bulbs. In the long run, businesses that support the environment will proliferate, but in the meantime, precious time is passing. Without legislators like you, where would we be.
Carol, Valley Center
I am concerned that seemingly well meaning but misguided governmental policies in the environmental arena create problems for future generations in the name of environmental protection. Some examples are governmental subsidies to the alternative energy technology industries such as electric cars and solar energy. I do not believe that the full environmental impact over the life cycle of the products and manufacturing of same is well understood. Example: What will become of all the spent batteries and solar panels etc.? What poisons and toxins are emitted into the environment during manufacturing, usage and upon disposal of these products? Failure to consider the life cycle impact of these products on the environment being promoted by our current U.S. government policies will be another time bomb created by politicians for future generations to deal with. Very truly yours,
Joel, Santa Cruz
My family & I are as baffled as you are by the Congressional Republicans drive to dismantle our hard-won protective environmental measures (such as the Clean Air Act,etc.). Please consider us members of your team in the fight to not only keep & enforce those measures, but strengthen them & add more.
Dina, La Jolla
I just read your email regarding a variety of issues you are concerned with. One comment amused me-you said that you could not understand why a Republican would not be in favor of protecting our environment and ensuring that we don't have to breathe dirty air. Is there anything that deals with the environment or for that matter anything that involves the majority of people that they are not against?
Irwin, Redondo Beach
Thank you for your recount of Earth Day's history and the changes that have been made. Most of all thank you for protecting us and our earth through your work in Congress.
Patricia, Berkeley
Back to top
War on Women
Californians respond to my message on “War on Women” Is Real: (NEW) Thank you for notifying me of your op-ed piece in Politico.com. I read it and printed it out for further reference. Please keep up the good work in fighting these discriminatory practices to women wherever they arise! I don't understand where all this is going - the State forcing all women to have any and all babies, and then not wanting to provide them with any food, medical care or education. What will happen to those unwanted babies?
Tracey, Thousand Oaks
(NEW) I am really disappointed to see that our government is trying to backtrack on important milestones that have deliver on our progress as women; I had not responded to you but I want to let you know I shared the article with as many women as I could. They are all women that I love and believe that will keep their eyes and ears open and that will stand out for our rights to make choices; I really truly believe there are other important subjects as our economy-(for instance), that has a greater need to be discussed versus women's health concerns and choices. All to thank you for your continuous support and for you to know that as votes this does not go unnoticed.
Theresa, Aliso Viejo
Thank you for calling out your regressive colleagues on the war on women. This is not a joke, I am not a caterpillar, and these officials have got to be replaced by people who represent all of us. With gratitude,
Peggy, Palo Alto
Betty, Irvine
I am writing to express my full support of your statement on the war against women. It is so disturbing to see this yet again - especially coming from people who profess to believe in smaller, less intrusive government. They won't protect us against toxics in the air and water but they will put a cop in our bedrooms.
Robert, Oakland
Thank you for keeping me current on the issues important to the welfare of women, which also means the welfare of daughters, sons and husbands. All people who are women, or have women they cherish, should understand that women's freedom to take care of their bodies is essential to the welfare of society. So, the logical question I ask is, “Doesn't the GOP have women in their ranks?” I think it's time for them to rethink their politics. They may be sleeping with the enemy.
Ariel, Tehachapi
Wow, great letter to Politico. Thank you Senator Boxer!
Andrea, Albany
No, the phony War-On-Women is just a P R stunt for the Democratic party and everybody can see right thru it. Don't deceive yourself into thinking everybody believes the phony hype that Republicans are "waging war on women". That is ridiculous.
Dave, Valley Village
Your article was right on, now what are the dems going to DO? Keep fighting for rational and reasonable people all over CA. Sincerely,
Steve, San Diego
Yes, it is clear that the Republicans hate women; but their campaign is part of the larger agenda of the Religious Right to move the US Congress toward creating a theocracy. It’s scary out there. Thanks to Barbara Boxer for holding the line. It can't be easy.
Ramona, Berkeley
I just wanted to send a quick note to congratulate you on a well thought out statement about the "war on women" and well articulated concerns. Seems we are mired in the "sound byte" generation, and often from the Democratic Party the only thing we are hearing are sound bytes followed by pleas for money. Yours is a refreshing thought piece! There is some serious testosterone driving the Republican party right now. Mix in some self-righteousness as you raise the bible in the other hand, and it feels we are going back to the 1500's. Let's hope that Democrats can continue to take the high road. Good luck. And thanks again.
Steve, Berkeley
I was a child during the 60s, but I remember the marches, bra burnings, Ms magazine. In fact in college, in the '70s I wrote a paper on “sex discrimination in employment.” As I've watched my daughters and her friends, it's clear to me that they really take their pretty equal rights for granted. While I'm, of course, very against what the Republicans are doing, I hope it shakes the young women up and bit. To help them “get” that the rights they have were hard fought. That they are amongst few women IN THE WORLD to have those rights and that they can and should work to keep them and spread them. Time to pull out "I am woman hear me roar!"
Frances, Los Gatos
They want to call us caterpillars, I want to call them the Republican Jihad based on the countries which refused to give equal protection and rights to women. This country is not just headed to pre-Roe vs. Wade decision, it's headed into the Dark Ages. The Grand Old Party is not so grand, just old. It is time for the women of America to stand up and be counted. We are angry and we are not going to take it anymore! What kind of country is this? I do not like the message we are sending to other countries, and setting dangerous precedents when women around the world are fighting for their very lives. I know you take abuse on a daily basis to do your job. That is UNACCEPTABLE! Women deserve and need a fair shot.!
Kathleen, Oakland
You nailed it. I think most women get it. I sure mention it to my friends, a few, who do not follow politics closely are shocked, when I tell them about the intra vaginal ultra sound. How disgusting. Some people mentioned that we should not call it a war on women, what do you think. Can we find something that portrays what the republicans are doing, without calling it a war?? I appreciate how you work for women and families ...really. Thank you.
Lisa, Redondo Beach
Aren't women the majority of people? What's happening here? This attack on women is an outrage.
Maya, Walnut Creek
I am a woman. I find it very offensive the way you are accusing the GOP of waging war on women. The fact that MANY people (not just GOP) believe that life begins at conception does not mean they at war with women. Those of us who are pro-life are NOT anti-women's rights. When the rights of two persons come into conflict, a judge must decide between them. Pro-life persons judge in favor of the “fetus,” whose very life depends on that decision. I am quite certain you would object to a mother dismembering her six month old because he/she negatively affected the quality of her life, yet you vilify the GOP and other pro-life people for protecting a six week old (in utero). This is not a war on women: it is a difference in perspective. Please stop this rhetoric about the GOP waging war on women. It's ridiculous.
Oshiana, Willits
Thank you for bringing these items to my attention. I had no idea how bad it has become. I thought we were evolving country. I would like to see more people understanding these things before they blindly vote for people who dont know or dont care how damaging these laws can. I have been utilizing Planned Parenthood from age 14 to 38. I usually always pay extra because they make me feel safe, I trust them and they will get me an appointment as soon as I need it. I am grateful that you are sharing what's up and not letting the “players”pull a smoke screen over humanity in our country. Bless you and keep up the good work. In gratitude and honor for our mother earth,
Kristin, Jamul
This article should be published in all the major newspapers in the country and on the Internet. Remind women, and men, that at the end of WW II, women were kicked out of factories and businesses so that the returning servicemen could have jobs. In a sense, the GOP and their followers are trying to turn the clock back 50 years.
George, Oroville
I greatly appreciate your contribution to Politico on the GOP's attacks on our rights. Thank you for all you do for the rights of women and Americans everywhere. We shall NOT allow the GOP to deny our rights to healthcare and health services or legislate that we don’t deserve equal pay for our work!
Akiko, Irvine
We have worked long and hard to gain fairer rights for women, and it seems this “Taliban-thinking” group of conservatives wants to take us back to 300 AD, too--to a place where women have no rights other than the right (and duty) to obey their man! What frightens me most are the number of women who also believe the Republicans are our only salvation, ignoring the facts before them of how many ways this group is attempting to take away the rights of women. So, thank you for stating the obvious, but putting it in a way that perhaps, more people will understand.
Caroline, Sacramento
As a feminist before there was even such a term your comments on the Republican War on Women resonates with me. I earned my degree in engineering in 1947 when women could only be nurses or teachers and of course couldn't earn as much as men. All these years later there is still a wage gap. I belong to AAUW which is fighting against this inequality. They are also promoting STEM for girls as our country is sorely in need of scientific and technical talent and it doesn't matter if such people are men or women as long as they can do the job. Please keep on making your voice heard not only on behalf of women but in support of the poor and the vanishing middle class.
Carol, Torrance
Thank you for writing this editorial, and thank you for sharing it with your constituency. It is truly horrifying to see this laundry list of discrimination against women, denied and masked by Republicans, in one place. This unconscionable political agenda is infuriating and hateful. That said, it is refreshing to know that there is at least one intelligent and reasonable politician in Washington who will fight for the rights of women and girls to have jurisdiction and control over our bodies. I truly appreciate your work in this arena and I am standing by you as you continue the struggle.
Heather, Greenbrae
These are scary times, especially for women. I have a twenty-four year old daughter and I am concerned for her future. This country is dishonored by men that dishonor, disrespect & show contempt for "women's issues". Thank you for representing me & my daughter, keep up the good fight, & keep calling "foul!" Sincerely,
Colleen, Chula Vista
Thank you for having the guts to call a spade a spade by naming how the Republicans have obstructed any possible “peace” on women in the WAR ON WOMEN and continue to wage their “WAR.”
Daniel, Berkeley
We need more of our Dems to speak up publicly on women's issues. (And where are the moderate republicans; they can’t all have had lapses of memory?) I can't believe after all this time that we're even discussing these topics. Younger women have no idea what their world would look like had millions of their mothers not taken a stand on equal rights for women and children.
Barbara, Coronado
Perhaps you can help me understand how the Senate works. I thought each Senator was supposed to vote for what they felt was the best option for their constituents. Yet I keep reading how various powerful people are getting the Republican members of Congress to give up their vote under the threat of having their party vote them out of office. Doesn't this qualify as extortion? I didn't vote for Grover Norquist or the Koch Brothers yet it looks like my interests have been turned over to someone who didn't even win an election for their job. Now they are playing the same game with woman's rights.
Rich, Corona Del Mar
Your article in Politico about the War on Women was perfect information to have when discussing this issue.
Jill, San Diego
Holocaust Remembrance
Californians respond to my message on Holocaust Remembrance Day:Thank you so very much for the message about Remembrance Day. A day of Holocaust observance is widely observed in Europe and I was so pleased to see, not only that a day has been established in the USA, but that my congresswoman bothered to remind her constituency.
Colleen, Santa Rosa
I was unaware Congress had set aside this day in 1980. I am saddened to think, all these years later, with some of the completely hateful things even candidates for the highest political offices in our country say and do, we might not see such legislation passed today.
Jayne, San Diego
I am a W W 2 veteran in a unit, the 101 st Airborne Div. that helped liberate one of the camps, the Nazi Holocaust is part of my memories.
Joe, Santee
I hope in the spirit of the remembrance we can strive for peace in the Middle East. One way to do that might be to not force people to negotiate for something that was taken from them by force. We need to remember the living at least as much as the dead.
Michael, San Diego
I fully support all efforts to remember the Holocaust, and all efforts to hunt down and bring to trial those responsible, even though they are now very senior citizens. However, I would be even more sympathetic to your cause, if you supported mine, which is to end US support for the atrocities being carried out by Israel against the Palestinians.
Nigel, Berkeley
We need to be very cognizant in the present day of people who desire to "remove" people of different religions or ethnicities from specified locations. The next Holocaust (and unfortunately, humanity has a penchant for these things) will likely involve someone other than Jews. The lesson from the Holocaust is that separate but equal is inherently unequal and people need to be taught to get along and not separated. Separation leads to yet more suspicion and more attempts to justify different treatment to different peoples. This is the appropriate time to be cognizant of the dangerous of segregation and ethnically cleansed "homelands".
Ruth, Orinda
Back to top
Surface Transportation Bill
Californians respond to my message on Senator Boxer to Speaker Boehner: Pass Transportation Jobs Bill:Finally, maybe something will get done. what exactly does this bill do? whom will it employ? is this a train/subway thing or road repair so that when we are transported, it won't be as though we are on an obstacle course. . .it is shameful that all of our highways, byways, bridges, need serious repair - are we going to wait until some more folks get killed before we focus on this too - the Los Angeles streets are disgusting - I bet Tijuana has better road conditions - what happened to that Bill?
Tom and Ursula, West Hollywood
Back to top
National Parks
Californians respond to my message on Celebrating National Park Week:It is nice to have National Park week, but lets get them enough money to keep them up and running with PRIDE. Thanks
Bill, Davis
You cannot imagine who much this week means to me as a Travel Facilitator-Interpreter for foreign visitor to the Southwest of the US. America in Chinese is Mei Gwo, which means: Beautiful Country and yes, indeed it is a beautiful country. But one should not take it for granted because there are entities who want to spoil the grandeur and importance at all levels of those parks by exploiting mines in or close to the Parks. I hope you realize the economic value of the Parks in Tourism dollars to the Parks and to the businesses in and around the Parks who mainly depend on those Tourism dollars. Thank so much again for this week and let’s hope for many years to come. Sincerely,
Rosemary, Manhattan Beach
Back to top
Cesar Chavez Day
Californians respond to my message on Celebrating Cesar Chavez Day:Thank you so much for the email reminder of Cesar Chavez Day and sharing links to the president's proclamation and learning materials. It means a lot when you and/or your staff take time to remind Californians of the great work done by leaders like Chavez. It inspires us to continue working for peace and social justice today.
Craig, Daly City
Back to top
Vietnam Veterans
Californians respond to my message on Honoring Vietnam Veterans:Thank you for remembering the Vietnam Veterans. Many still sweep this era under the carpet ignoring all the Vietnam Veterans experienced during the unpopular war and the lack of appreciation delivered upon their return home. As someone who just lost their Vietnam Vet mate, I have experienced that the wall of acceptance for these veterans still exists and the benefits other veterans survivors receive are not available to those of the Vietnam war. Perhaps this will be a step to tear down the wall and create the river of acceptance.
Martha, Winchester
I support anything that honors veterans of the Viet Nam era. They put their lives and there life on hold to serve the people of the United States. They were brave young people, who knew nothing about war, but went off to fight for our freedom. They were my friends and relatives, some not coming home; others coming home to be hostility...... How wrong was that????? We owe each and every veteran of the Viet Nam War our respect and appreciation. Please give them a "Thank You from the people of the United States. Sincerely,
Barbara, Victorville
Thank you for your sponsorship on the Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day. I'll be passing it on to all my family, friends, and Vietnam veterans. Your support is very much appreciated.
Ronald, Montclair
As a Vietnam Veteran, I would like to thank you and your fellow legislators for recognizing us with such a day. Thanks,
Michael, Temecula
I would love to thank you for you proposed legislation to have a day honoring Vietnam Veterans. My husband is a Vietnam Vet (USMC) 3 Purple Hearts. He is proud of his service and fellow marines. He has never felt any gratitude from his country. The only person to thank him was a Vietnamese immigrant that worked with our daughter. We went to visit her for a tour of her company in Mountain View CA. This young man came up to my husband and thanked him for his life, and his family members lives. Isn't that amazing? My husband was so choked up he couldn't speak. I'll never forget it. I will never forget you in my prayers. My husband just walked into the room...he thanks you and said you would have made a great marine! I agree. Keep up the great job you do for us. Thank you for your service to our country. If you happen to speak with our beloved President, please tell him that one of his earliest supporters wants our troops out of Afghanistan...yesterday. Semper Fi
Pat & Ray, Sacramento
I want to thank you for initiating the proposal to make March 29th a day of observation to the VietNam Veterans. I am sorry it has taken so long to do this but am very glad I was still alive to see it even tho my husband wasn't. Sincerely,
Ferrin, Yuba City
I am a vietnam vet. Thank you for your effort to remember our war. I hope this becomes an official day to remember those of us who served.
Richard, Murrieta
I too would like to see a special day for these men and women who gave so much for our country. My dad spent 20 years in the service and I am a proud Navy brat.
Linda, Lancaster
It is indeed a good idea to welcome Vietnam Veterans Home. After all the years they had to deal with the war pain and pain of other at home that did not care for their work done for their country, it would mean a lot to so many to be recognized, especially when some were drafted to go and did their best for their country. Thank you.
U. S. Navy Veteran Danny, Long Beach
I'm glad people are begining to realize that to a soldier or sailor, the Viet Nam war was just as trying as anything we are doing today. I fully support today's military man but let's not forget the thousands that served in good faith 40 years ago.
Terrell, Riverside
It is about time. As a Vet during the Vietnam war. Even though I did not go over there I meet a lot of fine men who did. I seen the pain in there eyes and I also feel the pain and lose that they would share with me and to this day I still cry for them as I well until I die. The American people well never know the pain that these men went thought. There were a lot of men in that time who never went to Vietnam that severed that also have the pain too. Every man in that time who was in the service (The Vietnam era) should also be talked about They got yelled at and called baby killers, spit on. I know I was one. Just ask any Vietnam Vet or one of that era what the American people showed them. Thank You.
Lynn, Oak View
I am very much in favor of identifying an annual day to recognize Vietnam Vets; however, have we also taken the time to honor our Korean War Veterans? Thanks,
Joseph, Pebble Beach
Thank you senator. Your efforts to recognize and applaud all Vietnam veterans is especially appreciated. I personally served one term in Phu Cat, Vietnam in 1969/1970.
Virgil, Riverside
Thanks, Senator Boxer, for working together with Senator Burr to recognize (or at least attempt to recognize) Vietnam Veterans. That was a tough time for all the servicemen that were coming home then...
Susan, Moreno Valley
I have always considered you as my voice in the Senate. I can't thank you enough for what you have done for us Vietnam Veterans.
Robert, Yucaipa
As a Vietnam War Veteran (1970-71) I would be honored if there were a Vietnam Veterans Day. As you know we were not exactly welcomed home when we who were still alive returned to the states. My own return was on a gloomy weekend day, with no one to greet me home which only added to the feeling of loneliness. Thank You for this opportunity to communicate with you. Respectfully,
Robert, Palmdale
Thank you for remembering our VietNam Veterans. My husband was a Navy Seal in VietNam and when the vets came home they were not greeted with respect. We have our Wall and now we need a day to remember all those who fought for freedom.
Sheri, Lake Elsinore
I just returned from California's State Capitol with our 3rd Annual Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day which was proclaimed 3 years ago to be March 30th annually by the Governor. Proclamations for that day have been made since then. Please re-adjust your date to be the same as the State. Somehow things did not go "right" to make you informed of what has already happened but we realize how busy you are with our other government affairs. Yours in continued service,
David, San Jose
THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!! I was drafted into U.S. Army in 1968. Served Honorably- Stayed stateside- 4th Bn. 39th Artillery, 18th Airborne Corp. Artillery, Ft. Bragg, N.C. I flew in uniform- Miltary Stand-by, to save money. I was spat upon at L.A.X. and in Tucson, Ariz. airport. Both times as I was moving up or down and escalator inside the airport. I can't even count the number of times I was called vicious, foul names. These men & women deserve this recognition. God Bless you! P.S. I got behind in college units as I was working two jobs and going to college. I became a teacher and middle school counselor. The military gave me great leadership training and the skill to work with diverse cultures and personalities.
Michael, Hemet
As a Democrat and a Nam Vet, Thank You!
Donald, San Marcos
This would indeed, be a wonderful way to show our sincere appreciation to our Vietnam Veterans. My husband is a very proud Vietnam Veteran! It was an honor for him to serve his country. He has no regrets! Sincerely,
Beverly, Riverside
It is great that there is an official day of reverence for those who served in Vietnam. Please pursue their health issues, PTSD and even chemical exposure for these veterans as ardently as health issues for Middle East war(s) veterans. Vietnam vets are now quite old, and the amount of time it is taking to have their physical and mental health assessments done IS A CRIME. Please use your political power help move veteran's benefits along. Thank you.
Caren, Ridgecrest
Thanks Senator Boxer for your support and honoring of Vietnam Veterans and all Veterans. Proud to be a California Veteran served 4 yrs active duty Jul 1967 - Jul 1971 with 3 Westpac tours to Vietnam and 27 yrs Naval Reserve and California Army National Guard. Thanks,
Victor, Clovis
I just want to thank you for your efforts in introducing a bill to honor Vietnam veterans. I was on a tour of duty in Vietnam for one year back in 1969 and although it was a rough time, I laughed harder and cried harder there than any other time in my life. Every day was quite a roller coaster ride. Thank you so much for your efforts!
Arthur, Lancaster
Thank you for supporting our Vietnam Vets. This was an unpopular and undeclared war at home, and the vets got the brunt of the nations divided feelings about it. They did not deserve the treatment they got for serving their country in spite of the governments confused handling of the issue both at home and in the field. I think the memorial to the Vietnam Veterans is the most beautiful and heartfelt of any memorial put up for any conflict, and that alone is a testament to the confusion surrounding this war. Our country's political wars should never extend to the battlefield where our men and women are actually fighting for their country. Sadly, it often has. The two are separate, and need to remain so. The people responsible for sending our armed forces to foreign places to wage war have little idea, besides political gain, about what they are doing, although they say things to the contrary. I wish this was not so. Thank you for supporting our Vets who are not part of the political process, only it's pawns putting their lives on the line every day.
Tara, North Hollywood
WHY NOW? AS A RETIRED AF COL., I SERVED IN VIETNAM FROM MAY 1966 TO AUGUST 1967 IN DA NANG AS A RESCUE HELICOPTER PILOT. I SEE NO NEED FOR A PARADE WELCOMING RETURNING VETERANS FROM THAT WAR WICH WAS SO LONG AGO. FOR THOSE OF US THAT WERE FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO RETURN IN ONE PIECE WE FEEL BLESSED AND LUCKY! A BETTER IDEA IS TO TAKE CARE OF SOME OF OUR CURRENT RETURNING MILITARY MEMBERS WHO HAVE LOST SO MUCH OF THEMSELVES, EITHER BY LOSING A LIMB OR SUFFERING FROM PTSS. AS A SENATOR PLEASE USE YOUR INFLUENCE IN THAT REGARD MAKING CERTAIN THAT THESE MILITARY MEMBERS ARE HONORED BY ASSURING THEM THAT THEY WILL HAVE THE EXACT TREATMENT THAT THEY DESERVE AND NOT SUFFER BECAUSE THE FUNDS WEREN'T THERE TO ASSIST THEM. RESPECTFULLY,
THOMAS, Riverside
Although I love the kindness & respect due the Vietnam veterans, my father being one of them, I feel that November 11th should celebrate all Veterans equally from all wars, large, small, etc.; that if we have a day specifically for them, we'd then set a precedent for each set of veterans for every war. So, as I support the idea and the intent, as it is very dear to me, I cannot support the bill. I would say that the country be willing to always remember those veterans from Vietnam on equal ground as all others, no matter how we floundered over there. Please know I go out of my way to give to the Vietnam vets and to encourage them when I encounter them and fund there many efforts, but I don't think a special day would be of true service. Maybe my thoughts will change if I go out to gather data on their behalf, who knows? Thanks for listening. Sincerely,
Paula, Chico
I was one of the very last Americans to depart Vietnam on that horrible last day of American presents, April 30th 1975. Also I was with the last two American Marines that were killed that early morning. My first time in Vietnam as a Staff Sergeant US Army was 1966. I was going to make the Army my life courier, but at the end of my tour I did not feel that we were doing the right thing and decided to take a honorable discarded from the Army. But as luck goes, in 1971 I returned to Vietnam as a civilian Communications Technician training the Vietnamese Solders on some very sophisticated electronic communication equipment that the US Army installed and left to the Vietnamese to operate and maintain. I had a position that allowed me to travel all over South Vietnam, all the way from the furthest southern Island to the northern DMZ. I think I feel in love with Vietnam and their people during this time. But yes there was still a very terrible war going on. I stayed in Vietnam until the very last day of American presence. Unfortunately I was with the very last two American Marines that were killed under hostile fire on that last morning of American presence. There were thousands of Vietnamese on both side that died that day, but it seems that the better half did win. The South Vietnamese government was so corrupt that there was no way they could have won this horrible war. I married a very wonderful Vietnamese woman in 1971 and in 1975 after the fall of the South Vietnam’s government, we were very lucky to be reassigned to Vandenberg AFB, which we have been here ever since. My wife’s family was very much a part of the Vietnamese government. Her Uncle, Tran Van Huong was the Vise President, and her father was a chief administrator, also in the government. One of her brothers was an officer in the army and chief administrator of the northern province of Quang Tri. Unfortunately after the war he spent 10 years in a concentration camp. Now that the war is over we now have a home in my wife’s home town of Vinh Long on her family’s property. Vietnam has progressed, but to some degree the north won the war but I think that the south won the peace. Vietnam is a very nice place to visit now and if you come across a north or South Vietnamese solder, they will try to share their experience with you on their part of the war. There are no hard feelings anymore on both sides. Vietnam is a peace. Sincerely,
Gordon and Van, Santa Maria
Back to top
Oil Company Tax Breaks
Californians respond to my message on Ending Tax Breaks for Big Oil:Thank you for your efforts to end tax subsidies for oil companies. 74% of the American people think this should happen, even a majority of Republicans think this should happen. The oil companies make billions and past $45 a barrel need no breaks to make a profit, and they are over $100 barrel. When testifying before Congress, the CEO's of the top five oil companies admitted that they do not need any subsidies. So why does this happen?
Nola, Irvine
Thank you for trying to end this ludicrous tax break. Why should the tax payer subsidize big oil companies who are making record breaking profits? Only confirms to the taxpayer that the lobbyists rule congress rather than main street.
Kurt, Ventura
Please urge our legislators to show their moral courage to vote for ending tax breaks for big oil companies, corporations, and those in the high income brackets.
Sue, Los Angeles
Keep up the good work. Big oil doesn't need its tax breaks any more than Mitt Romney does. Continuing to subsidize oil production and consumption not only distorts our economy, it exacerbates the negative environmental effects of carbon pollution.
Lee, San Carlos
Thank you for standing up for the American People in requesting the end of tax breaks for Oil Companies. It is very sad greed has shadowed the American Dream for most Americans. It is sad many members of the political parties are being bought out by big business. Our country is not for sale.
Theresa, Signal Hill
So glad to hear you are in support of legislation to end billions of dollars a year in tax breaks for big oil companies. We need to continue to wean ourself off of oil and if anything, oil companies should be paying more taxes for all of the destruction their product causes. This is undoubtedly a step in the right direction. Thank you.
Christian, Paradise
I generally vote Republican candidates; however, you received my vote in your last re-election. Why? Because you have demonstrated a solid understanding of military and National issues that affect National Defense and our economy. It is ridiculous to continue a subsidy for oil companies who continue to rip off the general public. The subsidies should have been cancelled on the same day that regulating the oil companies was lifted. Because oil directly affects our National economy, it would be appropriate to re-regulate the oil industry and to establish regulatory control over those on Wall Street who speculate on oil futures resulting in artifical increases in oil prices. So long as the oil companies continue to ship oil overseas at the same time as we are importing oil for foreign countries, the United States will never be able to become independent. Please continue your efforts to stop the subsidies to oil companies and find ways to regulate the industry and Wall Street. It directly affects National Defense (fuel/oil lubricants for military aircraft, ships, vehicles) and the military industrail complex that directly supports military operations.
Charles, Tehachapi
I just wanted to express my gratitude for not wasting any more of our badly needed tax dollars on such an undeserving bunch. It's too bad we couldn't take the money we used to spend subsidizing them and spend it on public education and lowering college tuitions. Maybe we can spend it like that instead! If we can then please do. Thank you for your representation.
Bruce, Oxnard
Your comments covered all the points, including unused acres, U.S. oil exports, etc, yet I cannot comprehend why Republicans are not voting in the interests of their constituents, since it will result in reduction of deficit. Horrible. Thanks for your efforts.
Karen, Vallejo
Ending a oil tax break will just increase the cost of our gasoline. Regards,
George, Irvine
I applaud your stand on removing the tax breaks for the oil conglomerates. As if the gas prices aren't high enough, legislation should be passed to stop it. I'm one of the little fish suffering with the high gas prices. Today I had to borrow $5 to put same amount in my gas tank, from a buddy to go to the store a couple of miles away.
Juan, Long Beach
It is stunning to me that, in today's dire situation, with gasoline costing over $4.00 a gallon, that you would think that taxing oil companies more makes sense!!!
Fred, Woodside
You stay strong against Big Oil. Who do they think they are fooling? Removing their "tax breaks" is NOT a "new" tax!!! It is simply saying they do not need "tax breaks" anymore. It is like when you let you child enjoy a "break" from the house rules when they are going through a rough patch. Re-instating the house rules when life gets back to normal is NOT creating new rules. Only a 5 year old sees it that way.
Nancy, Rescue
I admire the stand you are taking and the opinions that you express on this subject. I am so grateful that there is someone to give a voice to those who oppose the rapacious operations of corporations claiming our planet as their personal property.
Michael, Los Angeles
Thank you for standing up to an industry that takes billions in subsidies while socking it to consumers and making billions!
Sarah, Fresno
I agree that the oil that the oil companies don't need the tax breaks, but since this will increase there cost of doing business will the try to make it up in higher prices to the consumer. Don't blame the higher gas prices totally on the refiners. If the oil producers only sold oil to the refiners directly, without the speculators in the middle, the prices at the pump would be much lower.
Dennis, Auburn
We applaud any efforts on your part to end the oil subsidies, we would also encourage efforts to end subsidies to all the other mega industries, viz. agriculture for one. Thank you.
Vitaly, Pacific Grove
I think Barbara Boxer Rocks! Love how she stands up in Congress - statistics in tow - against Big Oil, and for the American people.
Sita, Los Angeles
Competition for dollars and oil comprise the two largest factors in the price of oil. Equally important is refining capacity. If you stop and think about it, the oil companies do make a huge dollar amount of profit. The question no one seems to be able to answer is what is their rate of return. It is easy to say to the constituents that we are going to tax the profits of the oil companies, but the issue of high gas prices goes deeper than net profit.
Sam, Bonita
Just a note to express my appreciation for your recent and past efforts on the matter of my subject line [Big Oil].
Carroll, Laguna Beach
And who do you think will end up paying for the money that you want to take from the oil companies? I agree that they probably don't need to have the subsidies but it will just get passed on to the American people. How about we produce more of our own oil increasing the supply of oil and therefore lowering the global cost...that will do so much good on so many fronts.
Travis, Buena Park
I appreciate your fine efforts Senator, but I was deeply disappointed in the failure of the Senate to limit or end the taxpayer support of the oil industry. They post larger and larger record profits year after year at the expense of working Americans and with serious damage to the American economy.
Donald, Walnut Creek
Quite honestly any time taxes are raised on business we, the consumer pays the difference. Prices at the pump will not change due to this legislation. We need oil companies to prosper, drill the oil we have here in the U.S. and thrive. My car won't run on algae, and by the time it can (if it ever can) I will be too old and broke to drive.
Diane, Tahoe City
As seniors who have been married for 50 years and are trying our best to keep our home and small car we THANK YOU. All the money that will be saved from giving it to the OIL COMPANIES should be used to pay off our debts to China, etc. I cannot see why anyone smart enough to be in Washington can't see what a great RIPOFF this is to the American taxpayers. Good luck and keep up the good work supporting the American people.
Marie, Reseda
You are spot on with your comments. In these days of the Republicans calling for the gutting of vital programs in the name of "budget needs" it is hypocritical to be giving billions to the oil industry which has never been in a better financial position.
Chris, Vista
It is outrageous that the republicans fight for the rich corporations with deregulation, subsidies, tax breaks and corporate welfare and then turn around and say we need to fix the deficit by taking the safety nets from the poor. This terrible ideology has left the 99% without a voice, in economic trouble and a future of environmental problems.
Lee, California Hot Springs
I'm tired of us all being labeled "anti-business" just because we expect oil companies to pay their fair share of taxes on their profits.
Douglas, Palm Springs
Thank for standing against greed! The oil companies want tax breaks not offered the rest of the citizens then use scare tactics regarding price increases if they don't get them. Their logic doesn't hold. If that were the case fuel would still be affordable . It's insulting also that they want to destroy prime wilderness for pipelines for "US" citizens fuel needs yet they are selling 60% of what is taken from our drilling resources to sell overseas. We get more efficient and less dependent so they get more crafty. Disgusting.
Valerie, Lake Elsinore
Until you have researched the effect of removing the tax breaks for oil companies, I believe you should leave it as it is. Not that I know everything, but I do believe that if you take off the tax breaks that gas prices at the pump would jump even higher than it presently is.
Richard, Sacramento
I completely agree that all subsidies to oil companies should be ended. There is no economic reason for retaining them at a time of record profits and long after the reason for granting them in the first place ended. There are plenty of environmental reasons not to continue them--air pollution, health, climate change.
John, San Jose
To get the price of oil down, you need to push for more oil exploration and possibly nuclear power. Sun and wind power, to a much lesser degree, would also be helpful. A very simple, straight forward solution.
Justin, Newport Beach
Keep fighting. Don't give up. There are so many people that support your efforts. I'm a mother of 5. All of us believe in you. Every one of my kid's spouses and their children are hoping and praying that you are successful in your fight.
Barbara, Vista
I just watched the video of you speaking on the Senate floor on legislation to stop the big oil handouts and I just wanted to say THANK YOU for standing up for our environment, for the average American, for new energy and for what's right.
Amber, Long Beach
With gas prices nearing $5.00 a gallon, it is unconscionable for big oil corporations to receive millions of taxpayer dollars to ensure their continued high profits. Those of us who often feel that we have no voice are grateful to you for representing our views. Sincerely,
Marcia, Idyllwild
Respectfully, you are wrong again. Take a look outside and be proud that oil companies are providing all the energy that we need to run automobiles, factories, generate electricity, and provide side products like plastics and pharmaceuticals and packaging products, etc. Also, the governments makes more in taxes from every gallon of gas than oil companies take in profits. We should encourage oil exporation within our own boundaries. we can do that safer and cheaper than anybody else. I doubt that this will ever reach your eyes but I feel better having said my small piece. Thank you, Respectfully,
Gerald, Palmdale
I listened to your message about the urgent need to end tax payer subsidies to the oil companies. These tax sucking behemoths would sooner choke on their own greed and destroy the planet than give up once cent of their 100-year subsidies. Welfare queens indeed! It is unnerving, even in these cynical times, to see the Senate behave as it did today in filibustering this important bill.
Karend, San Diego
Instead of making oil companies and Republicans out to be the bad guys point your arrows at the oil speculators. Those are the guilty guys that are driving up oil prices and gouging us! The amount of record profits speculators are making are truly obscene. This is where we need some limitation and regulation. You want to get this economy moving? Reduce taxes. Encourage US Companies to bring their hoards of money home by not imposing penalizing taxes on them.
Dominic, Anaheim
You summed it up in one sentence. "Rich big oil companies are making record (billions) profits". Oil prices are unbelievably high for no apparent reasons other than speculation. It's time to cut the tax break, and use the money generated for funding schools and state & local governments infrastructure projects.
Joe, San Bruno
It is truly inconceivable that in this economy any one (regardless of their party) believes that in giving billions of dollars in tax breaks to big oil companies, any good for the American people will come out of it. I would love to see the next step in creating alternative fuels that will enable American dependence on oil to fade away. The first step in breaking the hold of big oil is by your efforts. They are greatly appreciated. Sincerely,
Roberta, Glendale
It is equally as stunning that you and the administration or willing to misrepresent the case concerning the oil companies. You are not sending money to the oil companies. They are getting the same sorts of tax breaks that other companies get.
Charles, Folsom
I agree, subsidies to oil companies is not right. They are pumping more oil now, importing less, but the price of oil/gasoline doesn't drop. No oil company is truly a "US" oil company. They will sell at what the world market price is.
Randy & Janet, Milpitas
You are right, they are making HUGE profits on the high price of oil and do not need any more money from the taxpayers.
Pamela, Santa Maria
I've always been under the impression that government subsidies were meant to help start-up companies succeed, not for established companies who make billions on their own while paying no taxes, all while contributing to the climate change issues we face today.
Dena, Newbury Park
I am in favor of eliminating the tax breaks to Big Oil. When thinking about what is happening to prices of almost everything because of the price of gasoline and the Oil Companies influence, why should we continue the tax breaks to big oil.
Donald, Riverside
When you raise taxes on big oil, who do you think will pick up the difference? The consumer will, thats who, the form of higher gas prices. We need an Energy policy that will reduce our dependency on foreign oil and increase energy and job production in our own country.
Dan, Newbury Park
I fully support ending these tax breaks for all the oil companies. Especially at a time when they are experiencing record profits, and the prices at the pump make it very hard for not only me, a disabled worker who has to live on SSDI payments for only working 28 years.
Taho, San Diego
I agree with the fact that tax breaks for rich oil companies are shameful. What concerns me is this: If we make them pay the taxes, won't they just pass those "costs of doing business" onto us? Thanks for what you do,
Nancy, Oceanside
I agree with your position on removing the tax breaks from big oil. The logic behind subsidizing these very profitable private companies is absurd as is the rhetoric of the republicans on why they need to stay in place.
Milton, Berkeley
We thank you for promoting the end of big oil subsidies. We must end their stranglehold on Americans. We support conservation, highly fuel-efficient cars (at least 70-100 mpg, if we are going to continue to use petroleum for transportation fuel), and finding alternative forms of energy. Our economic model needs to change to sustain our population and protect the health of the people and environment!
Jim, Bishop
I do not agree with you regarding remove tax deductions for oil companies. Oil companies deserve the same deductions as any other American company. If you want to help, change the way it is speculated.
Victoria, Bakersfield
Thank you so much for addressing the Senate yesterday about reducing tax incentives to Big Oil companies, and preventing their authority to drill along the California, Oregon, and Washington coast, and in the pristine Arctic.
Darlene, Spring Valley
Please reconsider your stance on the oil subsidies to the oil companies. As you know our country needs these companies, and we need do drill, and explore our own country for more oil. If we take away some of these companies incentives, they will raise their prices possibly. We are dependent on oil, and we will always be. Let's get creative, and process our oil in a clean environmentally safe way, that would put a lot of people to work here in the US and we could enjoy our current lifestyle, and we wouldn't be looking at all of us driving around in these tiny smart cars that are so tiny, they are dangerous...Thank you for listening..
Molly, Lakewood
Thanks for supporting removal of tax breaks for oil companies. Our country needs to invest in green energy, not oil. Sincerely,
Kim & Alexandra, La Crescenta
I am thankful that the majority of the Senate voted down the proposal to end the oil company subsidies. To do so would further erode the situation. What you need to do is to get behind the Republican proposals to open oil exploration in the US, end the continuous regulation that stifles our energy companies and get on board with the pipeline project. We need to be more energy sufficient and put people back to work.
Donald, El Dorado Hills
The Oil companies don't need these tax breaks! That's billions of dollars that could be spent on developing new and supporting current alternative energy sources, fixing our nation’s infrastructure, making education more accessible for everyone, tweaking social security so it survives to my sons retirement and bunch other things that are waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more important than giving barrels of money to a handful of guys that are spending it on an energy source that we been using for the past 150 years.
Steve, Santa Monica
I respect your intentions, but I feel the content and the approach is wrong. If you were successful in passing this legislation and remove the tax break, all the oil companies would do is to compensate that on pricing. The price of gas would go up and the consumers would be worse off.
Sam, Pasadena
Thank you, once again, for trying to do the right thing by Californians and Americans alike and speaking against and voting to end oil subsidies.
Barbara, Roseville
If you take tax breaks away from big oil, they will only pass on the loss to the consumers. We will continue to pay higher prices. Don't make a mistake at this time by thinking more taxes will work. Who pays in the end. The consumer. We need to drill here and become energy independent.
Kim, Fresno
Thank you so much for your efforts in trying to eliminate the tax break for oil companies. Please don't give up the fight.
Carolyn, Valencia
We need the oil companies on our side. Punishing them tends to make them our adversary. They will just pass on their tax increases to our increases at the gas pump. Thus we'll have higher gas prices than ever. We both know that increased taxes don't increase government revenues so what is the point of taking away tax incentives? Respectfully,
Howard, Lake Forest
As you must know the government subsidy to which you refer is given to all manufacturers but at a lower rate to "big oil". I am retired and I depend on the profits from stock ownership for my income.
Herbert, Rancho Santa Fe
Big oil needs no more tax breaks. Give it to middle class Americans instead. We need to be allow middle income Americans to survive. Big oil is rich enough. They need to pay their fair share.
Sami, Rancho Palos Verdes
I appreciate the fact that someone is standing up to the gas companies. The consumers that have to depend on oil conglomerates have no say in the price of a gallon of gas. I understand that they are trying to find new resources but I am sure that their pockets are more than stuffed with profits that are over exuberant and unfounded.
Steven, Pacifica
I entirely concur with your position that tax subsidies to the oil companies should cease, but with one huge caveat. I will support abolishing the subsidies on oil companies when subsidies cease across the board extending to ALL companies and entities. Tax subsidies are a sick perversion of the tax code, repugnant and should not exist.
Mark, Ukiah
Thank goodness for your efforts to get rid of these tax breaks for corporations. These corporations are making record profits, giving their executives big salaries, bonuses and other perks; but they have done nothing to provide much needed jobs.
Susanna, Los Angeles
Thank you for your comments on Big Oil, and rescinding their tax breaks! I think the public needs those tax breaks, rather than Big Oil.
Gayna, Garberville
I don't think taking subsidies away from oil companies will necessarily benefit the general public. I think quite the contrary will occur. They will pass the loss of subsidies along to customers in increased prices for thier products and your little plan will backfire! I think they call it "the rule of unintended consequences"!!
Dan, Oxnard
I couldn't disagree with you more. The large oil companies provide millions of jobs, and continue to strive for better ways to produce energy in this country. They are not only "oil" companies, but natural gas, and petroleum products... Offshore drilling, shale gas...we have all the energy resources we need in the US, and you and your fellow Senators keep us from accessing it. Should we develop alternative sources, of course, but that is a long term solution...
Diane, Escondido
I am outraged over the way oil companies are gouging Americans. Thank you for standing up to them. I encourage you to support subsidies for alternative energy. I am building an electric motorcycle which I will use for daily transportation. Please fight for tax credits for alternative energy systems (like my motorcycle) that can end our dependence on oil. We can, and we must end our dependence on oil.
Leo, Vista
Any tax the government imposes on big oil, it is tax on the common worker at the pump. Binh, Redlands
I 100% agree that big oil should not get any tax break or funding from the government. I am neither a Rep or Dem but the Reps talk a great deal about wealth transfers and free markets without big government and it would seem to be that taking money from me .. to give to big oil puts them at odds with their core beliefs. Instead, that money .. every penny should go to pay down the debt.
Jorge, Santa Clarita
Back to top
Ford Ord
Californians respond to my message on Preserving Fort Ord as a National Monument:Yes! It is a great idea. My brother trained for Vietnam there. My daughter now goes to CSUMB there. It is beautiful.
Suzanne, Sacramento
Normally, I am against the federal government taking land for national monuments. But Fort Ord is a different situation for me. I did basic training there and I also served in the hospital there later on. The area is beautiful and should be preserved.
Bob, Watsonvile
I am delighted and hope you are successful in getting all that beautiful land on our Western Shores protected for future generations. As a veteran who was stationed there, I especially treasure it. You did it for the Presidio of SF--now for Fort Ord! thank you
Mary Margaret, San Carlos
Thank you Senator for recommending that Fort Ord be designated a National Monument. On Sep. 6, 1960, I started my way to Citizenship by joining the U.S. Army (fresh from arriving from The Netherlands in June '60). Fort Ord became my 'home away from home' for 6 months while getting trained to join the ranks of one of the best armies in the world. Normally Basic and Advanced Infantry Training is not the time you enjoy the great outdoors, but even then I recognized the beauty of Fort Ord. That training and subsequent 7+ years active duty served me well throughout my life. Wish you well in your endeavor to get Fort Ord the designated it so well deserves as a National Monument!
Pieter, Turlock
I saw your message on Ford Ord. While I agree that in a perfect world this sounds like a nice idea, I don't believe that with our current fiscal crisis that the country or State should be spending money on niceties. Lets fix the economy and our education systems first.
Dan, Santa Cruz
I am very happy that you have asked President Obama to designate Fort Ord as a Nationally protected area. My late husband was sent to Fort Ord before he was deployed to Korea during the Korean conflict and he always felt that this was an important place in our history. Thank you for doing this.
Barbara, West Sacramento
Thank you for your support and advocacy to make Fort Ord a National Monument. It is, indeed, a lovely part of our planet and needs to be preserved.
Frances, Capitola
Thank you for your efforts to bring permanent remembrance to Fort Ord and its history. I had the experience of being trained at Fort Ord in 1963 and recently took my family through what is left of the base. It is great they made a State University out of part of the base. I can't think of a better conversion from battle training to education. I hope your efforts are rewarded.
Barbara, Capistrano Beach
We are very, very appreciative of your clear, direct, totally-valid request to the President and Secretary Salazar to designate the priceless Fort Ord as a National Monument. When members of Congress (and certain Presidential candidates) call for rampant exploitation of federal lands, it is wonderful to have a courageous, independent voice calling for their preservation for generations to come. Sincerely,
Duncan and Betty, McKinleyville
Thank you for your letter to the President regarding the Fort Ord Public Lands. My late husband's father and uncle trained at Fort Ord in the early days of World War II. My late husband, two sons and I spent four wonderful years at Fort Ord in the mid 1970's. Designating the Fort Ord Public Lands as a national monument is fitting.
Helene, Bonsall
I don't agree with wanting to set aside Fort Ord as a national monument. It's mostly wooden structures that need to be demolished. As a veteran from the Vietnam era, I believe it's a waste of good land. The entrance and a few acres should be preserved with a nice monument. I'd like to see the land put to good use.
Marcus, Burlingame
I've visited Fort Ord many times over the years and I agree that the land should be preserved. I think it's important that the land use be maintained in such a way that open space is preserved and kept in a natural state and formerly human inhabited areas are put to the best use possible such as the case with CSUMB. Thank you for your attention to this national treasure.
Steve, Ben Lomond
Please continue to support the Fort Ord National Monument lands. As things go in our 21st century, if these lands are not set aside, sooner or later they will be developed to accommodate the every growing population and we will all lose in the end.
Jeanne, Ben Lomond
I add my support for your letter to the president urging him to preserve Ft. Ord. It is a part of our history that cannot be lost, and should be available for many future generations.
John, Long Beach
I agree with the land of Ford Ord becoming a national park and especially for the benefit of veterans. What a brilliant idea on your part! Thank you for all the good work that you do.
Terry Ellen, Los Angeles
I firmly agree with you that Fort Ord should be preserved as a national monument, open to the public, and especially to serve our veterans. Thank you for taking this step.
Keith, Pleasanton
This is an old, out of date, dilapidated army base that needs to be torn down before is collapses. What would be beautiful is a thriving business center in the area helping support the economic growth of the Monterey Area. Thank you
Ilene, Salinas
Fort Ord should be saved as a historic land where so many young men trained for WW II as well as Viet Nam. It is a beautiful area of land and sea shore that should be remembered. One of my brothers trained there before shipping out for the South Pacific. It was a place he later took his children to see: it was part of his history. Though the Catholic mission nearby has been “decommissioned” it too remains part of our history as a California museum. I am, as always, so grateful for your continued oversight of historic places in California.
Patti, Eagle Rock
I applaud your efforts to permanently preserve Fort Ord. My only wish is that the preservation plan would specifically include camping, hunting and fishing along with the other proposed uses.
Sterling, Sacramento
I appreciate your effort to save Fort Ord as historic site. I hope that our President Obama will consider to save Fort Ord as historic site.
Arthur, Sacramento
Thank you for the work that you're doing to preserve Fort Ord for the people of California and the rest of the United States. But it served as a monument to all of the military people that trained at Fort Ord.
Charles, Lompoc
Please turn Fort Ord over to private enterprise, so they can make this into a profitable endeavor, to create jobs, which is so desperately needed. We do not need another park, or monument that drains our economy. Thank you.
Wes, Indio
Leaving alone the "military" recognition, this park certainly could be preserved. Its location, size and potential for commercial and resedential development is probably high. We would just as soon see it set aside for public and environmental purposes as having it developed. Thank you.
Dennis, Sebastopol
I feel that your initiative to preserve Ft. Ord as a National Monument is a wonderful idea. It not only honors our veterans, but it provides beautiful open space for the Monterey Bay area.
Judy, Aptos
I am pleased that you are urging President Obama to recognize Fort Ord as a National Monument. My brother was stationed there for about two years. It is truly a beautiful place and deserves this recognition.
Marisol, San Francisco
Wonderful Idea, what did The President say? We have several veterans in our family that suggest building a Casino & Hotel there for them too. Imagine a profit making R & R facility for Veterans. Thank you for your dedication & support of our military.
Ardeth, Tulare
I would support your proposal to designate Fort Ord California as a national monument. I did my basic training there in 1955 and returned in 1956 to Fort Ord Hospital for duty after medical training at Fort Sam Houston. I cannot say that I really enjoyed my time at Fort Ord, except after I returned to work in the hospital and later at Hunter Liggett Military Reservation (now Fort Hunter Liggett) as an Army medic at the dispensary. Those were some of the most rewarding experiences of my life. Yes, I would support your effort to convert Fort Ord to a national monument.
Frank, Buellton
C'mon, we can't afford to maintain the Beautiful Natl Parks, the last thing we need is more overhead for a wasteland of sand and juniper. With Budget cuts everywhere and my salary the same as 7 years ago - let's work on the crisis, not the insignificants.
James, Aptos
Thank you for your letter to President Obama regarding Fort Ord. We are residents of Salinas and our family has spent many hours hiking trails in that beautiful natural environment. It is a place of beauty and wonder.
Jim, Salinas
Thank you for writing to President Obama about designating Fort Ord as a National Monument. As a resident of Monterey County, I know this area well and fervently wish to preserve it as a public area so others may enjoy its beauty, now and in generations to come. And what an appropriate tribute to the many veterans who share its history! This landmark, along with the recently announced Veteran's clinic and, hopefully, a Veteran's cemetery at Fort Ord would indeed honor and serve our heroes.
Patricia, Pacific Grove
THANK YOU FOR YOUR LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT REQUESTING FORT ORD BE A BEAUTIFUL REMINDER OF ALL OUR MILITARY WHO HAVE SERVED. IT HAS ALWAYS BOTHERED ME THAT SO MANY OF OUR SERVICE MEN AND WOMAN CAME HOME TO PROTESTS, A NEGATIVE ATMOSPHERE AND ZERO SUPPORT FOR THEIR CITIZENS AND COUNTRY. I HAVE SEVERAL FRIENDS WHO SERVED IN VIETNAM COME VISIT ME HERE IN WATSONVILLE WHO WANTED TO REVISIT FORT ORD. THEY WERE TAKEN BACK AT THE DISREPAIR THEY SAW. THE HOCKEY RINK THAT IS THERE IN MARINA NOW, WAS THE OLD GYM AND MANY GOOD FRIENDSHIPS WERE DEVELOPED THERE. MY VISITORS WERE GLAD TO SEE IT STILL FUNCTIONING AS A 'HAPPY PLACE'. ONCE AGAIN THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING OUR MILITARY! ALOHA ,
LEINAALA, Watsonville:
Back to top
Senator Barbara Mikulski
Californians respond to my message Honoring Senator Barbara Mikulski:Just wanted to let you know how much I totally enjoyed your remarks about the Senator. Not only did I learn something about a great woman, but I appreciated your truly respectful comments and your great delivery of anecdotes about her.
Jane, Anaheim
Please extend to Senator Mikulski my congratulations on her record setting tenure in the United States Senate and her work on behalf of working families throughout the United States. Also, please extend my heartfelt gratitude to her family for their support of her years of service to our nation.
Robert, Redwood City
Congratulations, Senator Mikulski. A well-deserved honor. Every time you speak, it is a welcome breath of fresh air: reason, knowledge, and immense compassion. Thank you for all that you do.
Sharon, Solana Beach
Thank you, Senator Mikulski, for your leadership! Congratulations on your perseverance, no matter the obstacles! You have made us all proud. Sincerely,
Jean, Greenfield
Thank you so much for your hard earned work and service!!!!! I think we can safely say the world has changed for the better thanks to all you have done!!!!
Geraldine, San Diego
Congratulations to Senator Mikulski for being the longest-serving of the very few women whose voices have been heard in our Congress since its founding.
Sheila, Boulder Creek
I was privileged to vote for Senator Mikulski's first Senate term when I was a resident of Gaithersburg MD, and twice again as a resident of Potomac MD. Although I was delighted to transition to California and Senators Boxer and Feinstein in later years, I am delighted to have been a part of that early Senate success. Congratulations on this wonderful milestone!
Karen, Sacramento
Thank you senator Mikulski for a strong women role model.
Sher, Novato
I teach Women's Studies at Cal State Long Beach. Every year I show the documentary 14 Women and I am so proud to have Barbara Boxer as my Senator and know there are women in Barbara Mikulski's state that feel the same way. Thank you so much for your hard work in representing women and being a voice in government that is mindful of the concerns of women. I am especially grateful for your efforts now, when such vicious attacks on women seem to prevail in government. Women in America are in danger of losing control over their bodies, losing the protection of the VAWA and still haven't achieved equal pay. We need more women in government like you. I encourage my students to become involved in government... to be like you and to fight for what is right. I so appreciate your work... thank you for your many sacrifices that you have made to make women's lives better. Sincerely,
Lizzie, Long Beach
I join you in acknowledging Senator Mikulski and thank her for her many years of public service. I'm sure it wasn't easy to "break through" when she did and it continues to be a challenge to have our representatives really reflect our communities.
Alice, Los Angeles
Back to top
Cabot's Pueblo Museum
Californians respond to my message on Preserving a Coachella Valley Treasure:I want to thank you very much for this, you have made many people very happy.
John & Fanny, Cathedral City
I am delighted that Cabot's Pueblo Museum is now on the National Register of Historic Places as it is one of California's special treasures! Thanks for your help in making this a reality.
Sylvia, Carmel
Thank you for your work on Cabot Desert Hot Springs, everything that you do helps in the preservation of our heritage.
Alexandra, Thousand Oaks
Thanks Barbara for also caring about the little things like Cabot's Pueblo. There are so many very important large issues facing this country and the world. It’s important to remember and cherish the little things that enrich our communities and our lives.
Jeb, Weimar
Back to top
Historic Judicial Confirmation
Californians respond to my message on the Confirmation of Michael W. Fitzgerald for U.S. District Court:Thanks for being open minded and willing to support the civil rights of minority Californians.
Bob, Colton
Thank you for backing the nomination for judge. Thank you for faithfully keeping me and anyone else informed on the work that you are doing in Washington DC on our behalf. Sincerely
Thomas, Sacramento
Great to hear that the Senate agreed with you and nominated Mr. Fitzgerald to the position of US District Judge.
Robert, Garden Grove
I look forward to seeing a judge who is an out gay man to show our young people that sexual orientation is not a barrier to service in our government.
D.L., Escondido
In re your latest post concerning the nomination of Michael W. Fitzgerald to the Central District Court and his confirmation by the Senate. I simply wish to thank you for submitting his name and for the leadership role you took in making this happen.
Frank, San Diego
This is a step in the right direction for California and for the United States.
Alan, Los Angeles
Back to top
MAP-21
Californians respond to my message Senate Passes Bipartisan Transportation Bill:Very glad to see a piece of legislation pass the senate with bipartisan support. I wish we would see a lot more including immigration reform.
Margaret, Bloomington
This is the way Congress should work: together!! Hopeful for the House.
Virginia, San Francisco
Thank you for helping to make this Transportation Bill a reality. Especially for maintaining the Transportation Enhancements and Safe Routes To School. Both of these items help to relieve traffic, oil consumption and can improve some people’s lives.
John, Santa Clarita
I'm glad you got the Transportation Bill passed. I'm very disappointed that it did not include the provision which, on a self-funded basis, would have provided incentives to convert significant portions of our large truck fleet from diesel fueled to natural gas. Natural gas is an extremely important fuel source which is available from U.S. sources and offers one of several ways in which the economy can reduce the use of oil...most importantly foreign oil. Newt Gingrich's fantasy of $2.50 a gallon gas is not just ridiculous, but it perpetuates the belief that the answer is oil and gasoline are the ways to run our transportation system in the future. Oil is not the solution, it is part of the problem.
Chris, West Hollywood
Our transportation needs are great and this will help not only our ability to move around the Inland Empire, but also our economy.
Daniel, Riverside
I received your email message about the transportation bill which you recently passed in the Senate, and while I think that it can be helpful, I'm worried about the extreme level of government debt. I'd like to see funding in general decreased in order to move closer to balancing the budget and reducing debt to more reasonable levels. As the economy improves, its incumbent upon our law makers to restrain their enthusiasm and move with serious resolve to reduce the national debt. Thank you, Damon, Petaluma
In a time of vast national debt and staggering government spending, why would you add to these problems by spending more tax payer money that you don't have for this unneeded bill? You don't have the money for this so you must increase national debt in order to fund it.
John, Granite Bay
Thank goodness this bill has moved forward and is closer to the President's desk. It will be a wonderful day for our nation, when we start improvements on our infrastructure and put so many people back in a fulfilling job.
Stephanie, Santa Rosa
I just watched several of your videos on the Floor relating to the Transportation bill. Excellent leadership on this bill!! Thank you for representing us!
Daryce, Redwood City
Our family would like to express our deep gratitude for all the work you do and especially for helping to pass the transportation bill. This means a lot to so many California families and the state in general. Please continue your great work, and remember that you always have our support and the support of the people of California. Best regards,
Yuriy, Galina, & Sean, Northridge
Please forgive my lack of enthusiasm for this new bill. My problem is I see it as just another government expense that will be paid for by people like me.
Duane, Redding
Nice work. We need the transportation work done and the jobs it keeps and especially any new jobs the work will create. It is nice to know that the two parties can work together on rare occasions. I hope they will do so more often.
Karen, San Francisco
Back to top
Genetically Modified Organisms
Californians respond to my message on Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods:It is OUR RIGHT to know what is in our food, and to be able to make informed decisions about the products we buy and the companies we support. I appreciate the actions you have taken to help push forward this effort to label GM foods.
Asha, San Diego
Honestly, my heart welled up with joy when I read your email tonight! I posted your good tidings on Facebook and immediately friends chimed in their approval. You are loved by so many of us! Such a bright light in our lives! PS: I'm an Organic Farmer for our small, family-owned farm, Kitchel Family Organics, north of Chico. I want our children and all future generations to have healthy food on their tables!
Lana, Los Molinos
Here is my facebook posting: Senator Boxer continues to exemplify integrity uncommon among elected officials. She defends the environment and for over a decade has tried to get the FDA to label genetically engineered food. When last night we witnessed the Carpinteria City Council become the first city to endorse the CA Label GMO ballot initiative, one councilman said, "This is a no-brainer; why hasn't it always been labeled?"
Jan, Ventura
You just got this old Republican's vote!! GMO's have to go. Thanks,
John, Covelo
There is a very difficult problem with labeling genetically modified foods: All foods that are farmed have been genetically modified. Selective breeding of plants and animals is a form of genetic modification that long predates modern molecular biology. The only foods that have not been modified by farmers are those which are harvested in the wild, e.g., fish in the ocean. The fundamental point is that genetic modification is neither good nor bad. It depends on the particular modification and its effects on the consumer as well as its effects on the environment.
Paul, Fremont
Thank you for your efforts and activism regarding the labeling requirement for genetically modified foods. This labeling issue is an important concern for me, and I know for my wife as well. We both hold doctoral degrees, she in Biochemistry and myself in Clinical Pharmacy. I am a firm believer that federal regulation needs to strengthened, not weakened in the areas of health and safety. As an educated citizen, consumer and father labeling laws allow me to make informed decisions for myself and my family. I do not wish to told condescendingly by some giant multinational that I needn't be concerned about genetically modified foods. I want to make that decision myself, and believe that I have the education and background to do so. Senator please follow through with this effort to mandate a labeling requirement for genetically modified foods. Sincerely,
Laviero, Daly City
I read your letter about GE foods. I am an MD, with a degree in molecular biology. I am unaware of any literature that would suggest that there would be any health concerns with this type of food. I wonder if you could direct me to any such information. I know that these techniques allow the food industry in general to be more productive, which ultimately leads to cost savings and more nutritious foods. I expect this is more helpful to the poorest of our society. You certainly seem supportive of genetic engineering of humans such as stem cell research, which I also support. Thanks
Arnold, La Jolla
THANK YOU for supporting this IMPORTANT issue!!! It is about the ability to make choices as the letter says. I am proud that BOTH Senators from my state support this!
Jane, Mountain View
Sincere thanks for your voice supporting the labeling of GMO food. Sometimes it feels like you're only one of the few in Washington that truly speak for the people you represent. California is lucky to have a strong leader such as yourself. Keep up the good fight. Sincerely,
Ann, Anza
Thank you for taking a stand against GMO's. It feels like a real battle of David and Goliath. It's wonderful to have you taking a stand for all the David's of the world. Here's to a healthy future where the consumer gets to choose what they eat. (which would be a loud resounding NO to GMO's!) Best wishes,
Louise, Los Angeles
Thank you for urging the fda to require gmo info on our potential food supply. I don't know if there is any danger or not but I do want to make that choice for myself. Also, you should URGE the FDA to fire that former monsanto exec. that is acting as a chief advisor......something aint right there if ya know what i'm saying.
John, Menlo Park
I hope the Senate will go a lot farther to regulate GMO foods. Currently pollination contamination is an economic reality that can ruin growers of organic produce the world over. GMO corporations like Monsanto, ADM, Dow and others can, and wish to, wipe out all natural seeds and get farmers to invest in their costly, deadly, one-time-use seeds. These corporations really do not care about a natural or healthy future --- I hope and wish you would act on that reality. Thank you.
Charles, San Francisco
Why are you working to require labeling of genetically engineered foods? I haven't been informed of any issues serious enough to warrant such steps. Nobody getting sick. No imminent extinction of some hyper-important species. No destruction of important crops through cross-pollination. There are so many important issues to deal with that I wonder how the issue of labeling foods containing genetically modified components can possibly compete for and win your attention. What am I missing?
Christopher, San Diego
Your efforts to persuade the FDA to label genetically engineered foods are appreciated. The fact that this has not yet been accomplished is a "tribute" to the ever-increasing power of corporations to obstruct the truth whenever the truth impedes profits. Good luck in this fight--you will need it!
Robert, Ukiah
I am pregnant with my first child and recently heard that researchers have found the DNA of the virus they splice to GMO Corn (to work as a pesticide), in the blood stream of women and their unborn fetuses! Since 75-80% of corn is GMO in the US I found this greatly disturbing and upsetting. I now feel I am forced to try and avoid all non-organic corn for the duration of my pregnancy making eating out very difficult since corn especially, is hidden in so much of what we eat today. Thank you again for this all important step in giving me more control of what I put into my body and that of my growing baby. Hopefully by the time he/she is born I will at least have fair labeling to help me avoid these disgusting frankenfoods. Sincerely,
Claire, Ventura
Thank you, Barbara for your support in labeling food products that contain GMO's. I won't feed them to my family and neither will most of Europe! California is an agricultural powerhouse, we need to keep it this way. Cross contamination by GMO's is inevitable. The very nature of farming is at stake. Reducing the use of GMO's also helps to reduce the use of herbicides and pesticides that are diminishing soil, water and air quality. So thank you, thank you, thank you. The stakes are too high to ignore!!!
Pat, Grass Valley
With all due respect, do you really believe the FDA will require GMO labeling unless they are forced to do so? Why not pass a law requiring it?
Karina, Willits
Thank you for your effort to label GMO. I wish you and your fellow Senators would consider going a mite further and banning GMO altogether. At least band them until test can be done to see what adverse effects, if any they have on people not rats but people. Again I wish to thank you for your efforts so far!!
Orval, Gerber
Thank you for caring about the health and well being of all people and for taking a stand against the potential frightening consequences of GMO's. It gives me hope for the future. Sincerely,
Arianna, Forestville
Thank you for your support of labeling GMO food! I can always count on you for a sense of intelligence and foresight!
Mary Louise, Murrieta
Thank you and the other 53 members of the Senate for standing up to Monsanto's take over of the FDA. Thank you for your support of the campaigns against GMOs, JustLabelIt and Right2Know. Thank you for all that you do,
Pat, Point Arena
Thank you so much, Senator Boxer for standing up for our food safety and demanding that GMOs be labeled. I feel this is one of the more crucial fights on the table currently as it's a experiment with the natural food change, with no idea on how it affect us globally and is being done by huge agri bullies like Monsanto PURELY for profit! I believe we not only vote in ballot box but also with our dollar and should know what we're supporting. And I believe studies have shown that when consumers know that GMOs are in certain foods, they'll opt not to them.
Erica, Los Angeles
Thank you for standing on the side of what benefits the environment and public welfare.
Lorraine, San Diego
Excellent. Please continue to be tough on Genetically Engineered Foods and the creators of them. I never want to ingest GMO's. Please fight for local farming and their rights to a GMO free field. The are too many stories where a farmer's right to his own crop has been challenged based on GMO drift. Regards,
Matthew, Ben Lomond
I believe in our right to know and I also fervently believe that one corporation should not control seeds by rendering them infertile and thereby exerting unwarranted power over food and other crops. The safety of gmo's is questionable at this point for human consumption so perhaps their infertility is a blessing. Nevertheless, too much power for one entity.
Pam, Santa Rosa
The idea that Americans have been offered up as test subjects to corporate engineering is sinful I hate to think of our future generations. Thanks,
Jo, South Pasadena
We consider this issue very important. Thank you for signing on to the letter to the FDA. It would be unconscionable not to label GM foods. For our health's sake, we need to know what we are eating.
Wallace and Joan, Mountain View
I am a volunteer in Santa Barbara gathering petitions for GMO Labeling. Your email was such a joy and relief to receive. :)
Celeste, Santa Barbara
We do not know all the ramifications of this tinkering with DNA, Monsanto is taking over farmers' fields that have been pollinated by the wind and no fault of the farmers, and studies NOT led by Monsanto are coming up with some very disturbing findings. I am gathering signatures to get the Freedom to Know initiative on the November California ballot. Thanks again! I really appreciate your stand.
Holly, Temecula
Before one can require the labeling of genetically engineered food, I think you first need to define what you mean by that term. Consider the corn you buy at the market, it looks like this: http://www.schreiberandsons.com/sweet%20cornimage.jpg. Now take a look at what it came from, how maize looked not much more than two hundred years ago: http://images.cdn.fotopedia.com/flickr-1411179526-hd.jpg. Only two centuries of genetic engineering have produced uniform color, bigger ears and bigger kernels. If you review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken#Origins, you will see that man has been genetically engineering ("breeding") chickens for thousands of years. My point is that genetic engineering of our own food is a human act as old as agriculture itself. Nor is it bad in and of itself. I find that the current proposal seems to be targeted at the wrong part of the problem. If a genetically engineered foodstuff proves bad for people to eat, it should be banned on that basis, not on how it was created. To do otherwise is to completely ignore the impact of 7,000 years of human history on the species of this planet we share with them.
Glenn, Felton
I normally disagree with nearly every decision and vote you make and our views on nearly every subject are polar opposites, but I would like to thank you for supporting this measure. Though genetically engineered foods to be consumed by humans should not have been allowed in the first place in my opinion, I appreciate that you are attempting to get it labeled so that those of us who wish to avoid such foods may do so. Thank you. Sincerely,
Mike, Lompoc
Thank you very much for listening to the people and urging the FDA to require labeling of gm foods so consumers can make informed choices on what they eat and feed their families. Please continue and take this issue as high and far as you need to get it done for the people. Thank you for fighting the good fight for truth and disclosure on our food and may it extend to all of our institutions and aspects of our country - by the people and for the people, not for profit's sake. Margaret, Santa Cruz
Thank you and your fellow law makers for sending a great letter to the FDA concerning out food supply.
Fran, Hemet
It is important to label ALL ingredients, including GMO's so we can make educated choices for ourselves and our families. Not labeling genetically modified food is underhanded, unfair and tells me that it is must be unsafe if they have to "sneak" it in our food unbeknownst to us. Label it and let us vote with our dollars! That's the way it should be.
Dawn, Van Nuys
Back to top
;){kind=link}
;){kind=link}
Girl Scouts Centennial
Californians respond to my message on Celebrating the Girl Scouts Centennial:Thank you for co-sponsoring Senate Resolution 310. My daughter is a Brownie in the Girl Scout organization and I look forward to sharing the resolution with her and her troop. I am certain this will put smiles on all their faces. Kind regards,
Laura, Sacramento
All three of our children are Girl Scouts. It is a fine organization that has provided opportunities for girls to experience camping, and many other events in a group that encourages good stewardship. We are impressed by the devotion of the troop leaders, and are thankful for their time and energy. Thank you for supporting this fine organization. Respectfully,
Bruce, Buena Park
Thank you for taking the initiative to remember the young women who may have a bright future here in America, with the right support. So many big current issues could make it easy to forget taking positive initiative for the young generation. Nurturing and preserving dreams is an essential component to the strength of America now and in the future. God's Love,
Michael, Garden Grove
The Girl Scouts are linked to Planned Parenthood, why are you celebrating that?
Bill, Temecula
I was a Brownie and then a Girl Scout through the eighth grade of school. Thank you for co-sponsoring the current bill in making 2012 the Year of the Girl. I have one request. I realize it is not your words, but please do consider asking the authors to change the wording slightly. The statement regarding Ms. Daisy's goal of getting girls out of the house is misleading at best. The actual goal was: "With the goal of bringing girls out of isolated home environments and into community service and the open air, Girl Scouts hiked, played basketball, went on camping trips, learned how to tell time by the stars, and studied first aid." This is quite different than the meaning that leads one to believe girls should work outside the home. I was a stay-at-home Mother for many years. My children and I are glad I had that opportunity and it was worth the sacrifices I made. I am particularly happy I was at home with my children as much as possible, especially considering that one of my children has passed at the young age of 30. Imagine if I had not had that precious time with him. There is nothing wrong with being a stay-at-home Mom. Please point out the seemingly small, but so important wording to the authors. Thank you for your efforts and for your service.
Nancy, Seal Beach
Back to top
Medal of Honor
Californians respond to my message Seeking a Medal of Honor for Sergeant Rafael Perlata:Thank you for having the back of my brother Marine, Sergeant Rafael Peralta. The apolitical attempt by you and Senator Feinstein to secure this medal for Sergeant Peralta is proof of the greatness of this great country.
Anthony, Placerville
Peralta's selfless act, caring for his fellow Marines, and sacrificing his precious life, deserves, at the very least, every medal available.
Jaime, Perris
Thank you, your support for this correction is sincerely appreciated. It is very disappointing to witness recommendations from Field Commanders ignored in the political halls of the Pentagon. I served at HQMC (Navy Annex) in 1967-1969 and often find decisions made within the confines of The Beltway very distressing and lacking in good judgment.
Charles USMC (Ret), Vista
THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ACTION TAKEN FOR SERGEANT PERALTA. I WISH I COULD WRITE YOU MORE OFTEN ABOUT THE GOOD THINGS YOU AND OTHERS DO FOR AMERICA. RESP.
H. D. USN ret, San Diego
Hon. Barbara Boxer our heartfelt gratitude is extended to you and the bi-partisan San Diego delegation in recommending Sgt Peralta for the much deserved MEDAL OF HONOR-SEMPER-FI
Daniel, San Diego
As a recipient of the Army Distinguished Service Cross from an action during my service in Vietnam, I am most interested in your supporting the proper awarding the MOH to this most deserving Marine. Awards for combat valor and always difficult and subjective in nature. If you would visit the Legion of Valor website and read through several members citations you will see just what I am talking about. see: legionofvalor.com This is without question one of those cases where the final determination fell short of what this young patriot deserved. Thank you for listening and thank you for supporting this American Hero. Respectfully.
Dick, Pleasant Hill
I stand with you in your efforts on Sgt. Peralts's behalf. He was a neighbor of mine in San Diego although I did not know him personally, he should be honored for his sacrifice.
Don, San Diego
Thank-you so much for your efforts to ensure that our servicemen who have given so much for our freedoms are honored. I would like to add my voice to others in expressing my gratitude for the ultimate sacrifice of Sergeant Rafael Peralta.
Apple, San Diego
Thanks very much for writing to the Navy secretary in support of giving the Medal of Honor to Sergeant Peralta. To my knowledge, only one Marine has been awarded the Medal of Honor as a result of recent operations in the Middle East, and I think this is very unfair to the many Marines who fought there. Best Regards,
Sgt Dana, San Diego
I would never second guess the people who make the recommendations to Congress for the Medal of Honor but this surely appears to be a case where their findings might be flawed and require a second look. Thank you for standing up for Sergeant Peralta and every other service person who has done what's necessary to protect us all. When you read of the exploits of so many of the MOH awardees it brings tears to your eyes. The unselfishness of these heroes is what sets them apart from your ordinary heroes like basketball and rock stars. Please don't let this fall through the cracks.
Don, Richmond
I believe that Sargent Peralta deserves to receive the highest metal that the military can bestow to him. His uncommon valor to save his men and not think of himself is the greatest thing a person can do. I read the story of Sargent Peralta and i cried. I pray for his family I hope that they will treasure the beautiful memories that they have of him, in this he will live forever. I say to the family, may you find comfort in one another and in God. Thank you for the service of such a wonderful person. respectfully,
Beverly, San Diego
Thank you so much for taking action on behalf of Sgt. Peralta. I remember reading that he was denied the Medal of Honor because the reasons stated. And at that time I thought it was totally unfair that it was denied to him. I sincerely hope this situation will be corrected. Thank you again for your efforts on behalf of the sergeant and his family.
Wiltrud, Suisun City
After reading all the particulars of Sgt. Peralta before I even received your email, I had made up my mind that he deserved the medal in question. In addition, awarding it to him makes common sense (some people have none) and it hurts no one; it can only help. Thank you for your efforts on his behalf.
Michele, Chula Vista
It has been my desire, for some time, that Sargent Peralta be granted the Medal of Honor. The accounting of the actions by eyewitness about Sergeant Peralta bravery was largely unacceptable by the Department of the Navy, and it's Secretary. However, the conclusions drawn from a medical reconstruction should not overturn the eye witness accounts of Sergeant Peralta's death, and the heroism exhibited by him. Many times, in the history of our wars, we have battle events that defy our human explanation of how they could occur, and it is my belief that this event is one of those special situations. Much earlier in my life I spent time in Viet Nam, and I have seen for myself how this works. It is my belief that God controls the outcome of events, in life and death situations, and we are not meant to understand the actions of God. We can only decide the actions taken by man. The Navy, and it's Secretary cannot refute or give an acceptable reason(s) for Sergeant Peralta not being granted the Medal of Honor, by our great country. The Secretary of the Navy must be convinced that Sergeant Peralta is deserving of this great honor, and then grant the right medal for his bravery.
Gary, Spring Valley
I wholeheartedly support the efforts of Senator Feinstein, yourself, and the rest of the California delegation to have Sgt. Peralta awarded our nation's highest decoration for gallantry and valor in action; the Medal of Honor. I recall that in all past conflicts his actions would have resulted in the Medal of Honor being awarded virtually automatically. As your communication states, the Marine Corps recommended him for the Medal of Honor and all eyewitness accounts support this recommendation. Hopefully the Sec. of the Navy will do what is right and reverse the original decision awarding the Navy Cross. Thank you again for your efforts on behalf of Sgt. Peralta, his family, and the USMC.
Philip, Escondido
I am pleased to learn you are supporting the effort to upgrade Sgt. Peralta's Navy Cross to a Medal of Honor. Your letter hits the mark--an award should not be downgraded because the awarding authority thinks that there is a chance the action didn't occur. A military award is a binary equation--if the service member did the act, there is award. If he or she didn't do the act, there is no award. There is no mechanism in the Awards Manual for downgrading an award for less than a 100% confidence an action occurred. Here, the Navy Cross Citation stated the Sgt pulled the grenade under his body. That is a Medal of Honor Act. If the awarding thinks the evidence more likely supports that the Marine was unable to accomplish that action, then the proper course is to award NO MEDAL. Downgrading the medal was a mistake. Sec. Gates and President Bush should have awarded the Medal of Honor. Evidence supports the actions occurred--eyewitness evidence. Doctors examining a wound ex post facto--Doctors who by the way have never been in combat, cannot accurately attest to the superhuman feats that occur in combat The Marines on the ground who were there testified under oath that the Sgt knowingly pulled the grenade under his body. End of story. It happened. He is in my eyes already a Medal of Honor Recipient. So, please continue this fight- Very Respectfully,
Christopher, San Diego
He should have got the proper medal of honor. This is a tragedy and should be corrected. He gave his life to save others, what more do you have to say!
Bruce, Temecula
Back to top
Letter to Speaker Boehner
Californians respond to my message Stopping the Attacks on Women’s Health:As a citizen and an Orthodox Catholic Bishop, I applaud and support your position regarding efforts to restrict the rights of women to make free decisions in reference to their health and other moral decisions.
Carlos, San Francisco
Your advocacy for women, children, for people is truly appreciated by this eighty-three year old about to be great grandmother. But I must express my sympathy for Mr. Boehner who apparently has no close female relatives, friends or associates. If he did he would surly realize what an afrontery his actions are to these people. Sincerely,
Gloria, Culver City
As an 80 year old woman, it is shocking to me that attacks of this nature are still happening to us. This attitude of controlling women's bodies is more deeply rooted in our culture than I ever would have believed when I married in the early fifties. After women served in the military during WW2, we thought we were free, after joining the workplace we thought we were free, and after "the 60's" we thought we finally had gained control over our own bodies-but now we are faced with the same old struggle. If we give up to the male right-wing we will loose our selves, and betray our daughters.
Evelyn, Soquel
I applaud you and all the other women senators for taking on Speaker Boehner and others like him. The attack on us women is unprecedented and uncalled for, and needs to stop.
Carmen, San Jose
Please don't try to vail this ridiculous notion, that we should pay for people's sex activities, as a women's health care issue. These liberal hair brained practices are killing our great country. Where is personal responsibility. You, the left, are trying to destroy our countries values and freedoms. Government is not the answer to everything. Much of the time it is the problem. I know that you think that your methods and tactics are the correct ones ,but I can assure you that you are wrong and have been wrong for a long time. Please stay out of people's personal business. Thank you, respectfully,
Gerald, Palmdale
Thank you for your letter. It's sad and atrocious that we are still fighting for access to equal and affordable health care. Regardless of someone's religious beliefs, our country cannot restrict access to health care for women or men. My mother is a Republican and a Catholic, yet she understands the importance of health care for women including birth control.
Cheryl, Petaluma
The attacks waged by the GOP on women's health care primarily contraception are outrageous and a waste of time. While this country is in the midst of nearly unprecedented economic challenges and global crisis involving climate change, armed conflicts and violations of basic human rights it is unthinkable that the GOP "leadership" would be wasting legislative time on what can only be a desperate plea to the extreme rightwing for contributions. Thank you for thwarting this attempts and trying to actually get something done. sincerely
Kivi, Culver City
I deeply appreciate your commitment to women's health. However, your characterization of contraception as an aspect of women's health completely misses the mark, and demonstrates how profoundly our society misunderstands the purpose and meaning of sexuality. As a deeply committed Catholic, I believe that sexuality has two purposes that cannot be divorced from each other: unification and procreation. Intentionally standing in the way of procreation via contraception is not an issue of women's health, it is a violation of the very purpose of sex and injures both the man and the woman who participate in it. I do not ask that this religious belief be legislated for the rest of the U.S., only that Catholic institutions (which do nearly immeasurable good in our country and around the world) be allowed to decide whether to provide contraception or not. In your oath of office, you swore to defend the constitution and all amendments to it, including the freedom of religion. Indeed, this is perhaps foremost among your responsibilities, since Christian principles have provided the moral guidance that has brought our country to the position of world leadership we now enjoy. I strongly urge you to seek to amend health care laws to respect religious freedom, providing a complete exemption of religious institutions from the contraceptive mandate. Regards,
David, Bonita
It is deplorable to me that the GOP continues its assault on women and continue to try to deny us access to basic medicines and procedures. Just as there is a separation of church and state, there should be a separation of state and medicine, or religion and medicine. These Republican politicians are trying to send us back to the dark ages and undo all of the women's rights movement of the last century! It has to be stopped! Best regards,
Ilone, Laguna Niguel
Thank you for standing up to Republican bullies who think that women won't stand up for themselves. I am disgusted by the name calling, and being a political pawn for pandering politicians. Thank you again for having our back!
Beatrice, Pasadena
Let's be honest. The beneficiaries of the HHS mandate to require employers to provide free contraception are people who have jobs that pay well enough that they can easily afford it on their own. The true working poor who might struggle to pay for contraception don't have employer provided healthcare in the first place, and will not be impacted. Most women will pay more each month at Starbucks then they will for out of pocket contraception expenses. Isn't this really about getting free stuff for voters. It is hypocritical to say you are "Pro-Choice" but deny those you disagree with you to have a choice that deeply impacts their consceince. Please reconsider your position.
Ed, Granite Bay
Your care about American women and future of our country, your hard work towards better tomorrow are greatly appreciated! You've got 100% of my support! With respect and gratitude,
Corina, RN (mother of 3 children), San Francisco
Back to top
Women’s History Month
Californians respond to my message on Celebrating Women’s History Month:thank you for this message. as a divorced minority woman, i have seen and encountered alot of prejudicies and discrimination. but, i have also seen alot of positive changes through the years. these were not won without a fight. it takes spirited individuals and the support of the people to affect change. these changes are not won overnight, but, with tenaciousness over time and the willingness of all. i am grateful to have you as my representative.
Anita, Los Angeles
It has become very evident in the past few months that there are some in our society that want to push women back to a past where we (women) are 2nd class citizens, that barefoot and pregnant should be our choices. Planned Parenthood funding, the Congressional hearing on contraception that didn't include women, Rush Limbaugh's/Patricia Heaton's comments all prove that bullying & demeaning women, limiting our access to healthcare is acceptable. The fact that some of us are standing up to say "wait a minute, this is not acceptable to me" shows that some of us won't put up with this demeaning treatment. Sad though, even in 2012, we do have to stand up for ourselves.
Micki, Grass Valley
I just wanted to thank you for your continuous fight for women's right and health issues. It is hard to believe that we even have these debates. I was at the Women's March a few years back and heard you speak on this issue there. Thanks for keeping up the fight. My daughter and granddaughters need someone to keep reminding our government that women should have the ultimate say in what happens to them healthwise. Sincerely,
Mary, Los Gatos
Thank you for standing up for women, half of the voters (at least). Between Rush Limbaugh and the Republicans recent attack on women and healthcare, seems like an old boys network witchhunt against women! My God, this is 2012, not 1612. What are they thinking (or are they?)
Rebecca, San Francisco
Back to top
Veterans Mortgage Assistance
Californians respond to my message on Housing Relief for Veterans and Service Members:[As a] Disabled Veteran, I just wanted to say, "thank you" for emailing me about the housing settlement. We lost our home to foreclosure because I am disabled but my benefits of 100% did not kick in until 2006. My wife is a realtor and the business was really down. We borrowed finds from family members just to make ends meet. I tried to work with Countrywide but they did not want to help me at that time. Now, we are renting a house in Los Angeles to accommodate my limited ability to climbing up stairs. I sure hope we can work something out with the Lenders so that we can qualify for a reasonable loan. My wife is trying to find employment to help with the household expenses but it is challenging right now. Thanks again for your support.
James, Los Angeles
We need to help our service men and women keep their homes and not allow the banks to forclose on their homes. They are out there protecting us and deserve to know that their families are being taken care of.
Ruby, Murrieta
Kudos to President Obama for taking measures to right the wrongs of this disaster for the 10,000 Iraq and Afghanistan homeless men and women veterans who also may suffer post traumatic stress. How many wrongs can we commit? Two wrong wars, then, victimize the very people we send to fight those wrong wars. It is shameful and sickening.
Susan, San Rafael
Now this is all real nice. I read the whole plan on providing housing relief for servicemembers and Vets who have been wrongfully foreclosed upon, denied lower interest rates, etc. But, when does it go into effect, who is going to monitor it, and what kind of rules are they going to have? In my dealings with gummint you find out that there are kinds of hoops you gotta jump thru in order to qualify. It's almost like a circus. I realize that the organization needs to protect it'self, but how about protecting the servicemember first? Thanks.
David, Vacaville
Back to top
“GI Bill” Trademark
Californians respond to my message on Protecting Veterans from Deceptive Marketing:Good idea! I used the real Viet Nam GI Bill to get an MBA after my Navy time in Viet Nam. It should be safeguarded against abuse.
Scott, Los Gatos
Senator Boxer, once again you have come through for my fellow veterans by sponsoring the "GI-BILL" protective measures. Your article clearly describes the underhanded practices the "for-profit colleges" are doing and have been doing. I almost fell for their sales pitch one day, but decided not to follow up with them. I have since learned from professors I know that this is the case. Thanks again for your never-ending vigil towards the well being of veterans and their families.
Juan, Long Beach
Seriously, I can't speak for all of us Vets, but your heart is really in the right place. I thank God that you are also in the place to make things like this happen.
Raymond, Taft
Back to top
Marine Helicopter Crash
Californians respond to my message on a Tribute to Seven Fallen Marines:It certainly appreciated that you remembered those young Marines who died serving our country. Thank you on behalf of all who have served who are joining in remembering the ultimate sacrifice along with their families and friends who loved them.
Stephanie, Marysville
Thank you for your tribute and recognition of the Fallen Marines. I am a U. S. Navy veteran that works with Veterans Seeking Employment and Benefits information. I am what is call a Disabled Veteran Outreach Program Specialist - DVOP. We operated out of EDD one stop Career Centers, in accordance to each state and the Department of Labor VETS - Veterans Employment Training Services. I have seen both those veterans recently returning and those that have been out of service for some time. It is hard for them to serve in a job and then be drop back into a society with not job all of a sudden. But to have you assisting them with their quest for economic success and to give them and me recognition and honor is highly appreciated.
Danny, Long Beach
I appreciate your keeping in mind both the soldiers who had been killed in duty, and the ones who are wounded, or just trying to hang in there day by day.
Arnethia, Chico
As a Marine, I am very pleased that you took the time to actually praise these fallen warriors who were my brothers. Thank You.
Anthony, Placerville
Back to top
Medicare Savings
Californians respond to my message Prescription Drug Savings for Medicare Beneficiaries:Please continue your work in supporting the plan that is in effect right now. I know that it has helped my mother and myself. We are both on a very strict limited budget like most that are on Social Security. It has helped us with our large medication expenses since the both of us take many medications. Since the plan took affect we have not had to cut back on our groceries just to get medications we needed. Those that want to reject this plan should have to live on just Social Security in the economy of today. Thank you for your support, great job.
Susan, Paradise
I am 73 years old and have had financial trouble purchasing my medicine during the donut hole, I have had to do without prescriptions because of it. I pray that the court leaves this issue alone. I have emphysema and am on oxygen 24/7, the drugs that help me the most and are the most expensive are Spiriva and Advair. I am on a fixed income with a small pension and social security.
Conrad, Los Angeles
I want to thank you so much for taking the time to explain to Seniors particularly what they must watch out from people who take advantage of Seniors. During these times when money is "tight", there are those who take advantage of Seniors in particular. Best regards,
John, El Sobrante
The prescription drug arrangement is a help, however, without getting our COLA for the last few years, and having the Medicare premium raise when we do, there isn't enough left over to help us. Then there is IRS collecting their needs -- so where is the great increase we are supposed to enjoy?
Mary, Mission Viejo
Back to top
Blunt Amendment
Californians respond to my message on Senator Boxer: A Victory for Women and Families:
senator boxer, thank you for what you are doing for womens rights. i am a 77-yr old women who feels like she is just waking up to the subtle and not so subtle ways we are treated. and im mad. im glad you have the power to be heard and will follow your/our progress going forward.
Nancy, Ventura
And yet again you do not disappoint...as if you ever do. Thank you for standing up for women everywhere. All the best.
Laura, Venice
Thank you for standing up for women's health care and speaking out against the amendment to let employers decide what they considered to be appropriate healthcare. I'm glad you used Jon Stewart's example of how absurd the results of the amendment would be.
Barbara, San Diego
To refer to this defeat as a great accomplishment is chilling. It might be better referred to as a great defeat for religious freedom, a freedom guaranteed by our Constitution. Forcing Americans to pay for insurance coverage that violates their beliefs is reprehensible. Lack of insurance for these services in no way eliminates a woman's right to obtain such services for herself.
Patricia, San Jose
Thank you for being one of the most vocal opponents of the GOP's war on women. I am so disheartened that the vote on the Blunt amendment was along party lines, and so close. What has happened to the GOP? Please know that what you are doing helps us keep our chins up, and helps us keep hoping and fighting for a better day.
Patrice, Topanga
Thank you for standing up for the rights of my wife and daughter. To say that we are pleased with your work as our Senator is an understatement!
James, Citrus Heights
I just wanted to say that you ARE NOT representing your constituents. I put myself through college and paid for my apt, food, car, insurance, contraceptives. I worked hard and still graduated with a GPA of 3.82. I am quite tired of this handout mentality that the dems seem to want to take us in. Sincerely,
Wendy, Malibu
Thank you for fighting against the Blunt Amendment and fighting for women's rights to quality comprehensive healthcare in accord with their own choices, decisions and moral beliefs and values. I was part of the first Womens March on Washington in the early 70's, wish that we didn't have to keep upholding access, equality and equity for women's health services but thankful for principled women like you who stand strong.
Hazel, Berkeley
I am absolutely outraged that anyone would even think to discriminate against providing insurance for women and their families. And to think that Congress would consider something like this is beyond any words that I can express. What could possibly be the motive for doing such a thing? Has Congress even considered the affect this would have on their constituents? I don't know if I should thank you for sending this information or what, because right now this information has my heart racing and my stomach is doing flip flops! Sincerely,
Linda, Fremont
THANK YOU for overturning the heinous BLUNT amendment. He should be ashamed of himself for proposing legislation that so blatantly rips away the rights of a certain group of AMERICANs. Women need to stand up to all of the states' bills that are also threatening out right to govern our own bodies. Best regards,
Carol, Redondo Beach
Thanks very much for your work in defeating the Blunt Amendment. All the females in the family and friends give and send our appreciation for promoting our issues.
Gloria, Vista
Exactly WHOSE family is this a victory for? Certainly not MINE when I am trying to instill in my children the value that all life is sacred. If, as a Catholic employee, I am forced to obtain health insurance that supports the cause of Planned Parenthood and their abortion agenda, I feel like this is certainly NOT a 'victory' for my family. And which women, who actually take the time and pay-cut to work for a Catholic organization, might consider themselves 'victors' when they have to choose whether or not to obtain health insurance that support abortions and sterilizations? Not me.
Audra, Long Beach
It is so disappointing to learn that the Blunt amendment was voted down. This is NOT a victory for women. It is a violation of the right of conscience for those who disagree.
Jacqueline, Santa Ynez
I am writing to thank you for speaking out against the Blunt Amendment. I am a 48-year-old woman and live in San Rafael. It it my opinion that birth control is a crucial part of health care and of course, planning for a family. Until recently, when I was able to start a group insurance plan, I had always paid for my own individual health insurance policy. My experience is that Anthem/Blue Cross would certainly find it morally unacceptable to pay for anything that it could weasel out of, regardless of medical advisability. Sincerely, your constituent,
Courtney, Larkspur
Thank you for being the voice for all women who can't believe that they want to set us back 50 years. Please continue to be that voice of reason.
Mary, Woodland Hills
I want to thank you on behalf of my daughters and myself for your comments on the floor yesterday and your help in defeating this bill. It feels like women are the target this year for conservatives and I am appalled that my daughters have to go through something I thought was behind all of us. Thank you for always standing strong!
Susan, Woodland Hills
I don't agree with all of your views, Senator Boxer, but on the issue of women's health, I stand with you proudly and staunchly. Thank you for representing me, our sisters, and yourself so well and so honorably. You've done us all proud! With the increased attacks on women's liberty, we're going to need your leadership more than ever.
Courtney, Berkeley
My religion forbids abortion but that is between husband and wife to decide. I don't want government in the bedroom. The woman must chose and the decision is hers not the government. Keep fighting. Good luck
Bill, Sunnyvale
Thank you for your vote against the Blunt amendment. Why white haired old men like me think they can dictate anyone's choice of medical care is beyond comprehension.
Jim, Eureka
It just seems so out of touch to provide a mandate for everyone to have medical insurance, and yet not mandate adequate coverage for everyone. No one would consider a health policy for children that didn't include monitoring growth rates and immunizations to be adequate, neither would a policy that did not cover men's erectile dysfunction, yet there are people out there that would think it would be okay to not includes some things because they find it morally objectionable. So, providing health care for 100% of men's bodies while providing health care to only a portion of women's bodies is somehow acceptable and moral? Sounds a lot like that "separate but equal double talk". All health policies must include coverage for 100% of bodies of both men and women regardless of their gender. Employers should never get to choose what the policy should cover. If they all do, then the cost will be mitigated across a much larger pool. A woman's reproductive health is every bit as important and every other part of every human.
Fay, San Diego
Thank you, once again, Senator Boxer, for defending women's rights. What is going on in this country is frightening and disgusting and must stop. I feel like someone has turned the clock back 30 years and we can't allow that to happen.
Judith, San Ramon
As a provider of women's health in my obstetrics and gynecology practice I support advocacy for our patients and against "attacks on women's health" issues by anyone, not just "Republicans". People have become disenchanted with politicians on both sides of the many aisles throughout government not being able to work together to legislate. Perhaps the aisle needs to be removed and everyone learn to work together for the benefit of all constituents. Sincerely,
Thomas, Fair Oaks
Thank you, Senator Boxer, for your strong position to oppose efforts to oppose Obama's efforts to provide contraception availability for all women. It is important to emphasize that it is the Republicans who are preventing Obama from being able to implement the beneficial things we know he stands for.
Carroll and Susanne, Santa Barbara
I totally disagree with your vote today, what the vote was about had nothing to do with women's health services. This vote was continued control by the government over our health service choices and who pays for them. The misinformation provided to the American Public on this issue makes my skin hurt. Any person, man or woman can walk into any pharmacy in American and get contraceptives. You do not need insurance for this stuff. It is a personal choice and the person making the choice should pay for the supplies. You get fire insurance to protect your house from a fire, you do not get insurance to mow your lawn or paint the house those are choices individuals make and have to pay for the supplies. Turning this in to women's health issue is ridiculous. I am sad at how this Country has turned into a nanny state system!
Teresa, San Ramon
I am responding to your recent e-bulletin about the defeat of Sen. Blunt's amendment. Thank you for being such a strong and ardent advocate for women's issues, especially women's health. As a religious Professional and former intern for planned parenthood, this issue is so important to me. I often neglect to jump into the "call you Senator" campaigns because I already know where my senators stand and I am so grateful. But, you should know that there are many women behind you and I am one of them! Sincerely,
Sara, Pasadena
Thank you for continuing to stand up for women and for human beings for access to health care, for respectful treatment of women and those less fortunate than the wealthy who by power and misuse their power out of a perception of privilege. I have created literacy programs, supported human potential, and fought against ignorance as an educator and woman all my life and I simply want to say thank you for standing up over and over again to the bigotry and cruelty of policies created out of religious fervor or wealthy privilege. My deepest gratitude and respect, Leslie, Sonoma
Thank you Senator Boxer for continuing to stand strong when it comes to women's health. These cynical attacks to deny critical health care to millions of women are shameful. Thank you for fighting for a woman and her family's right to make responsible choices concerning parenting. Republicans seem to conveniently forget that the decision to have a child is a serious one and that children lose when people who aren't prepared, ready or capable don't have the means to prevent pregnancy.
Alison, Los Angeles
Thank you for all of you hard work and support for women and families in this unthinkable attempt to eliminate as many rights as possible. The crazy positions and comments coming from these people is not challenged enough.
Diane, Palm Springs
I was more than shocked at the bit of news I heard tonight-due to circumstances and what was broadcast-It sounded like you were equating contraception with illnesses such as diabetes and stroke. Surely there was a problem with editing from the TV News station because is surely put your speeck in bad light from my perspective. I do support religious objection to financing abortion and contraception. Women and couples can surely pay for contraception it is a choice- just as abstinance is a choice.
Sheila, Martinez
Great job! Glad to hear about the defeat of the anti-women's health coverage amendment. Please keep up fighting the good fight.
Loren, Los Angeles
It would have been an outrage to women's health care to have allowed the Blunt amendment. I appreciate all that you do to protect reproductive rights and to protect women's rights in general.
Jonee, El Sobrante
Your vote is against our rights--how dare the govt make me pay for contraceptives and take away our 1 st amendment rights all in one vote.We are slowly losing our rights.
Roberta, Claremont
Well done in fighting and prevailing against Senator Blunt's unethical, immoral, and decidedly un-American bill. Keep up the pressure to salvage the American dream. Yours sincerely,
Mark, Ventura
Senator Boxer, after hearing today that the "Blunt" amendment will not go away, I implore you and all of the women in the House and Senate to let the country know what a hypocracy and double standard this war on women's rights is. Are men covered for vasectomies(which makes it impossible for a man to father a child) in any of those healthcare policies? If so, would that be deemed immoral or sinful by a religious organization? We must not forget, that men can and do purchase condemns at will, also, to not father a child. I am a Christian, and my message for all who support this "Blunt" travesty or anything like it, is "Remove the beam from thine own eye".
Elvira, Norwalk
Since when did getting "contraceptive" for free be categorized as "critical health care services" as you describe in your blatantly misleading e-mail to your constituents!! Can you be more dis-ingenious? Why didn't you honestly portray the fact that you defeated a bill which would allow Religious employers to deny payment for a service based on their fundamental religious beliefs...what happened to "free will" ? If an employee does not or cannot respect the beliefs of their potential religious employer then find another employer!! I am woman who believes in contraception but I respect the religious freedom that our country was founded on!! You need to represent and respect the rights of all of your constituents! Sincerely,
Lori, Carlsbad
As an American citizen and Christian, I am outraged at the passage of legislation requiring health insurance companies and Christian based organizations to provide funding for abortions. Passing this legislation in spite of overwhelming opposition to this bill upsets and concerns me deeply about my elected officials disrespect for the will of the people on this issue. I am disappointed with your vote in favor of allowing this funding to be provided in spite of my disapproval of it, and thousands of other Americans like myself. As a Christian, I believe the sanctity of life. All of life is given by God. Life begins at conception in the womb. Only God has the right to begin and end life. Not man, woman, or any act of Congress should be allowed to overthrow what God has expressly ordained to exist. I urge you Senator Boxer, to prayerfully reconsider your stand on this issue and change your vote on this matter. Thank you for listening to my concerns.
Bruce, Chula Vista
I guess the separation of church and state, as stated in the First Amendment, doesn't mean anything when the Federal Government wants to involve themselves in deciding what the Church can or cannot do for others. I would think that people that are applying for a job at a church or other religious institution would know that institutions stand on contraception. Bad precedent!
Charles, Santa Cruz
Californians respond to my message on Stopping the Attacks on Women’s Health Care:
Thank you for opposing the Blunt amendment. As a mental health care provider, not to mention being the wife of a heart patient, I cannot imagine any more callous misuse of legislative powers than this amendment would allow. Thank you for representing the great majority of all of us!
Pam, Willits
It's hard to believe that we have legislators who are so intent on limiting the access of ordinary people to a full range of health care. I understand that it can be complicated when trying to respect the wide range of beliefs of the people in this country but some people seem intent on trying to impose their beliefs on everybody else. And thank you so much for always standing up for women's health issues especially in regard to access to contraceptives and safe abortions. I would really like the need for abortions to disappear but that seems unlikely to happen. In the meantime I believe that the best way to reduce the number is by education and access to contraceptives and that we need to keep abortions legal to protect the health of women. Sincerely,
Arden, Palo Alto
Thank you for speaking out so forcefully against this bizarre amendment. It is not only an attack on women, but on our society as a whole, and it is totally unacceptable. Keep fighting for the common good.
Barbara, Daly City
I applaud and support your vigilance in fighting any intrusion into the right of every citizen to affordable healthcare covering both pre-existing or current health issues.
Susan, San Rafael
I completely agree with you regarding stopping the Blunt Amendment. It puts too much power in the wrong hands. Cancelling should not be for any reason. Thank you!
Sam, San Bernardino
I thought we had at least conquered the right of women to have control over when they get pregnant, or at least let woman try to prevent disease. But these right wing nuts are over the top on this (and many other) topic(s). Thank you for the work you do. It must not be easy!
Vicki, San Diego
Thank you for objecting to this flawed amendment. If this country had universal health care, we would not have to worry about employers picking and choosing which procedures we could, and could not, avail ourselves of.
Mark, Sacramento
The Republicans are trying to use this issue of Catholic-run business trying to get out of playing by the same rules that all other employers in the public marketplace do to dismantle the Affordable Care act and any kind of regulation of the medical insurance industry. This amendment would lead to chaos and a total breakdown of regulating the content of medical insurance policies. We need more of our leaders taking a reasonable stand such as yours.
Alexander, Altadena
Back to top
All-Male Women's Health Panel
Californians respond to my message on Senator Boxer Criticizes House Republicans for All-Male Panel on Women’s Health:The audacity of the members of this committee is beyond belief!!!
Susan, Los Angeles
The age when men made all the "important" decisions for the "little woman" are long gone, and have been for years. We are educated, informed women. We ARE NOT children. We ARE in control of our own health.
Carole, San Francisco
I'm a male but even I would find a panel discussion about women's health "inappropriate" without women on the panel and women as witnesses. Actually I might use words like "absurd" or "unproductive" or even "unethical". Thank you for speaking-up.
Darrell, Fort Bragg
I couldn't agree with you more! Women will unite to protect our rights - yet again! Your voice is powerful, we need for it to be heard -- often and loudly.
Perri, Santa Rosa
I am appalled that our male legislators would dare to convene any kind of meeting to discuss OUR health issues without inviting women to testify on our behalf. I wonder how they would like us to make important decisions for THEM! That is just plain ridiculous. I am a retired professor in the mental health field, and I am 73 years old! I thought we women would have overcome this type of ignorance by now but I guess not.
Martha, Altadena
Please fight for Women & get men out of women's health or at least make the panel even with 1/2 women & 1/2 men.
Carole, Woodland Hills
Back in 1962, it was the lone female MD on the FDA's decision board that stopped the legal process to allow the drug thalidomide to be prescribed to pregnant women for nausea problems. All the men MD's voted 100% to have it cleared for the American market as it had already been placed onto the European market. The drug was halted by the lone female who asked what research had been done to determine its safety for pregnant women. She delayed the drug long enough for the world to realize that it caused birth defects throughout Europe. I am eternally grateful to that woman MD because I was pregnant with my first child at that time and I was prescribed another drug which did not harm my fetus, but caused terrible side effects for me. I would have been prescribed thalidomide at that time.
Josephine, San Diego
How utterly presumptuous and inappropriate! Please continue to represent women's issues in the Senate -- we need it so much!
Elizabeth, San Bruno
Your points are well made. It is absolutely essential that all women have the right to healthcare and especially to those services that impact reproductive choice, hormonal balance, and mental/emotional/sexual health.
Corrie, Long Beach
Thank you for standing up for us all! This is getting crazy. For my mother, myself, and my daughter.
Stephanie, Los Angeles
That all male panel considering women's health issues is a travesty. The views coming from the right sometimes make it hard to remember that we are in the 21st Century. Please keep fighting. They must not prevail, for the sake of all women.
Janie, Novato
I just viewed online your excellent video clip of your remarks about the all male/Republican committee discussing women's health care and reproductive needs. Keep up your good work!
Virginia, Berkeley
The email I just received from your office was disappointing. It sounds as though you are whining like a child. Women's health issues deserves better and it starts with leaders leading, not crying. We need a voice that will encourage women to be responsible for themselves and to be their own advocates. We need examples of women not relying on government to tell us what is right or what we should do, or be dependent on programs that dictate what women should do. Please stop this tone and child-like response.
Peggy, Fresno
Thank you from the bottom of my heart for pointing out to a group of men making decisions about our health that we might want a say in this. This is the kind of paternalistic attitude that I see in most of the republican legislators. They want to decide what's good for us even though they cannot and will never experience being a woman (or a poor person, or disabled person or a veteran or a student!) I don't trust them, and neither do any of my women friends, mothers, daughters, aunts, grandmothers, granddaughters and sisters. Thank you from all of us,
Kathleen, Morro Bay
I would point out that in addition to the exclusion of Women from this topic, it appears that medical personnel were also excluded from this hearing. Only religious persons were present for this farce of a hearing. It is ridiculous to claim that women's well being is of interest to this hearing when both medical personnel and women are excluded. Thank You for your attention to this important topic.
David and Alexandria, Van Nuys
To my mind, it is unconscionable that at least half of those chosen were not women. I applaud your clarity on this extremely important issue.
Therese, Fairfax
Back to top
Tax Scams
Californians respond to my message on Guarding Against Tax Scams:Very good information to know about the "dirty dozen" from IRS thanks,
Gabriel, Rowland Heights
Thank you for offering this opportunity for your constituents to be well informed citizens.
Elizabeth Anne, Davis
Back to top
SC Edison Solar Connections
Californians respond to my message on Lowering Taxpayer Costs through Clean Energy:This is great news and about time. I am having solar installed on my own home in two weeks, and I would be livid if it took 2 1/2 years to being able to benefit from this investment. Can SCE be held liable for the millions in losses from the impasse?
Anya
Your language is correct & assertive, but I believe a "big stick" is also required in this instance. Can you think of one or more such "sticks"? Hope you do. And you have our full support.
Dina, La Jolla
CPUC Pipeline Audits
Californians respond to my message on Improving Pipeline Safety:I applaud you for taking a stand to hold PG&E accountable. Thank you for taking action in this time of frustrating political gridlock.
Richard, San Jose
Please continue in your important work of demanding more audits of pipeline operators in the California Public Utilities Commission. A recent audit of Pacific Gas & Electric revealed disturbing violations of pipeline safety regulations and the questionable use of millions in ratepayer funds. Thank you for your attention in this matter.
Ann, Cupertino
I want to thank you for calling the California Public Utility (PUC) to report your deep concern, regarding Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) gas line safety. What it will take is a bold legislators to change the structure of the PUC. But thanks for trying.
David, San Jose
PG&E are so non-transparent and unresponsive that GAS services and electrical services should now be separated into two business that compete. You are trying to micro manage PG&E gas. Natural gas stations for those cars need to be in place for those vehicles that need CNG. Same for electric charge stations for electric vehicles. A home owner with solar should be able to sell back to an electric company any excess electric usage - thereby negating the construction of new power plants. Our Utility Commision is clearly in bed with PG&E
Walter, Saratoga
I think you should know that just yesterday my neighborhood suffered a 12-hour power outage, the causing being stated as "underground failure." I live in suburban Cupertino; there were no weather problems, and yet PG&E couldn't bring power back for 12 hours. We have regulatory capture here. The PUC is pretty much useless. I don't think more audits are going to take care of the problem. The company uses our payments for bonuses and profits at the same time that they neglect maintenance and repair.
Elaine, Cupertino
Thanks, Senator Boxer, for pushing CPUC for more inspections. And, why, when PG&E was given money for this and upgrades that they didn't do, would CPUC allow them to charge ratepayers for any of this? They basically stole this money for spiraling higher executive salaries, bonuses, lobbying, pet projects, etc. (Bonuses to management that bankrupted the company?-Man, what a deal!)
Roger, San Francisco
Profits over safety, bonuses over fairness, rewarding the incompetent is becoming the norm. PG&E and the PUC should be held accountable, not the taxpayers. When PG&E had financial troubles a few years back, management were given bonuses to stay on and restructure. Why? Management of big business, especially a monopoly, need to be accountable? In the San Bruno explosion, the audit found negligence, therefore, your strong letter is NOT enough. PG&E is asking the PUC for a rate hike--again, the taxpayers pay. It is time for your office to say No and hold companies accountable for their mismanagement. In this case putting greed before safety resulted in devastation. Perhaps criminal charges need to be investigated and filed by your office in this matter.
Marie, Millbrae
I agree with you regarding the PUC. They are more concerned with their relation with the industry than with diligently protecting the consumer.
Charles, Palo Alto
Keystone XL
Californians respond to my message on the Keystone XL Pipeline Decision: Thank you for your message in support of President Obama’s decision to not approve the Keystone Pipeline, but to encourage the pipeline operator to re-submit an application. I don't oppose the refining of tar sands, but I think the original plan in which the pipeline crossed a critical aquifer is too risky.
Sincerely,
Duncan & Betty, McKinleyville
I am so appreciative of President Obama’s courage in denying the permit for the Keystone Pipeline. Our country needs to create jobs with a long-range sustainable growth plan, and not with projects like this that have potentially devastating effects for our planet. Senator Boxer, I hope you and the other members of Congress can create such a plan on paper, and continue to put climate change at the forefront of decision-making.
Mervis, Santa Rosa
President Obama will not issue a permit for the building of the Keystone Pipeline because of lack of time to study the project. He has had almost 3 years for the study of this project, why does he need more time? The President has promised Brazil a loan of $2 billion for their offshore drilling of their oil reserves of which 41% is borrowed money which will be added to our national debt. The building of the Keystone pipeline will all be done with private money and will not increase our national debt. The project will create an estimate of 20 thousand jobs to build the project and many more maintenance jobs will be created after the project is complete. We should be drilling in the United States with reserves of oil and natural gas which is estimated to last America 100 to 200 years. In the interim we could be developing renewable energy which could serve the U.S. many hundreds of years after that. Very truly yours,
Merritt, Pasadena
I was very disappointed to see this pipe line stopped. We need to have energy for this great nation to continue to prosper. As you know the Mid-East is and has been in turmoil for more than a decade. Therefore we need to continue to develop friendly energy sources. If Canada ends up selling this energy to China, we will have lost again in this battle. Yes, we all have hope for alternate energy sources but as you are well aware these green energy programs are not ready to eliminate the need for oil and natural gas at this time. Please rethink your decision!
Joseph, Encinitas
I just sent a message to President Obama to thank him and his administration for rejecting the Keystone XL tar sands oil pipeline. I’m glad that you also are happy with the president’s decision and that you did not want this hazard for our environment. I know that I can count on you to do what is best for our country.
Anne, San Diego
Thanks for your opposition to the Keystone pipeline. President Obama has made the right decision and we need to continue to oppose this boondoggle no matter what route is proposed. Tar sand is not a sustainable source of energy and this project must be rejected.
April, Montara
I disagree with your decision to support President Obama in rejecting the Keystone Project. There are thousands of miles of underground pipeline across this country already. This is the safest way to transport petroleum product. Why on earth would we not want to receive this fuel from a friendly nation, whom is our largest importer of petroleum products? I think this decision is purely political in nature and unfortunately makes no sense in terms of homeland security, our economy, or our need to reduce our dependency on fuel from hostile nations. You are bowing down to a small, vocal, elitist group of high-profile celebrity environmentalists at the expense of our country's economy and homeland security.
Ana, Elk Grove
Thank you very much for standing behind President Obama in his decision not to allow the Keystone Pipeline to go through. This was a crucial victory against Big Oil and all those who would strip our country of its natural resources and pristine environment to suit their corporate ends. There are many other possibilities when it comes to solving our future fuel needs and I hope that these sources can be more fully explored before we allow this destructive endeavor to go through. I applaud the President’s foresight and your strength to back him up as we continue to fight for the last of our unadulterated lands. Best wishes,
Monica, Los Angeles
As a prof. of biology, I have a sinking feeling that leaks in the pipeline would contaminate the aquifer below them.
Ivan, Los Angeles
I am proud of our president for standing up against the oil industry and for our environment and the welfare of our people. Thank you for your support for this decision.
Allen, Pollock Pines
I was sure that you would support the President's decision, but are we not supposed to be thinking about, proposing, acting on other fuel supplies that are cleaner and more efficient. Why do we just keep talking about finding more domestic oil? Do the oil companies own everyone in Congress?
Pat, Santa Barbara
This is a mistake not to approve this pipe line. It has been in the works for three years and we need the oil not China. Our gas prices are getting out of hand. It is getting to the point that people on fixed income cannot afford the price of gas.
Donald, Weed
You and the President have done what is right for Americans by stopping the pipeline to Texas. The environment would have been put at great risk without enough studies. We could use the oil, but not at this risk. We all still remember the Gulf disaster recently. Haliburton and BP are both equally guilty on this because of an inferior valve. Again, not enough inspection. Thank you,
Manuel, San Jose
I've been frustrated by President Obama on issues but today I am so proud of him. I’m sure it took a great deal of political courage to make this absolutely vital decision and I applaud him for having the courage to stand up to big oil and for the environment and stop what could have led to a major disaster for our country. We can find jobs in other places than this horrendous pipeline. It's shocking to me that Canada is despoiling their environment in this way but thankfully we won’t be.
Joan, Marin
President Obama made the correct decision regarding the Keystone Pipeline Project. It was a bad project from an environmental standpoint and a global warming standpoint. I'm sure the oil industry will cry great crocodile tears but it was still the right thing to do to cancel the project. Thank you for supporting the President's decision and resisting efforts to destroy our future for short term profits now.
Tom, Humboldt
As you noted, there are too many unknowns that could affect the environment and health to proceed with a project of this magnitude at this time. I am very pleased there will be an extended period for in-depth review. Hopefully, this will help prevent such tragic unintended consequences such as the Exxon Valdez of over 20 years ago which still affect the Alaskan environment and various species today and the more recent BP Oil spill (also responsible are Transocean and Halliburton)in the Gulf of Mexico. Clearly, these instances demonstrate we cannot be careful enough with pre-construction studies. For any project with the potential to contaminate our environment, we must use high standards such as 99.9% fail safe instead of 80% commonly used in project management economic estimates to reduce development costs. I didn’t mean to make this a rant... Sincerely,
Paula, Chatsworth
I enjoyed reading your message of support for the President’s decision not to issue a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline. I agree with his decision and with your statement. However, I also feel that the very important considerations about the health impacts of the pipeline and its threat to the magnificent agricultural resource we Americans enjoy in our heartland are not the essential objections to the pipeline. While they are indeed important, the crucial point to emphasize in discussing the issue is the fact that our country, and indeed the whole world, is in the midst of a huge transition away from fossil fuels and into an age of green energy and sharply increased efficiency. If we made the pipeline a lot safer and found a way to protect the farmland, it would still not be okay.
Kent, Sherman Oaks
I strongly disapprove of President Obama's decision. I feel that this was a viable plan that benefited our nation whether or not the oil was destined for use here. It is my understanding that U.S. citizens would be involved in its construction and maintenance. Perhaps also our refineries would be involved in processing some of the oil before it's being exported elsewhere. I also have read that at least one of the states crossed by the pipeline was already involved in rerouting that portion of the course transecting its territory so as to avoid some of the environmentally sensitive areas. Also I would like to see us support an energy project emanating from a nation so friendly to the U.S., one of our strategically important allies in the world.
Cynthia, Valley Center
I have just read your statement in support of the Obama Administration's decision on the Keystone XL pipeline. I am glad that you supported denial of the permit for the pipeline, yet the reason for your support is that "serious questions... remain unanswered about this proposal". In my opinion, no matter how those serious questions are answered, this pipeline is a bad idea. It is becoming clearer and clearer that we are reaching the end of the era of fossil fuels. We "frack" to get gas while poisoning our water supplies; we remove mountain tops to get coal while polluting streams below; we tear up entire boreal forests to get at tar sands that must be "steam cleaned" at great expense to extract the oil... The time to move to renewable energy is now. No re-routing of this pipeline can make tar sands oil a good idea. It should be left in the ground.
Howard, Alameda
The decision not to issue a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline project was a huge mistake. This country needs the oil that it would deliver, and it would create much needed jobs. There is a balance between protecting the ecosystem and taking care of human need. There are both necessary. If this pipeline is not built, then the USA needs to drill for and process our own crude. We cannot rely on foreign products any longer. Our national security depends on us producing our own energy. As usual you ignore the wishes of your constiuents.
Kevin, Riverside
I agree with you and the administration to withhold a permit for the pipeline. There are too many unknowns that can cause environmental risks, health risks, and more. There should not be a rush to put this through. We need much more research. The people who gain economic benefit do not care about the inherent risks. Once it's done, there is no turning back. Thank you.
Rabia, Encinitas
I am pleased with the president's decision to not authorize the XL pipeline and I am equally pleased with your concurrence. Tar sands and the pipeline are the wrong way to solve our energy problems. We have huge, largely unexplored ways of saving energy via retrofitting homes, offices, and manufacturing facilities, as well as equally underutilized opportunities to use solar and wind energy. We should be emulating other countries, such as Germany and Japan, that are way ahead of us in these areas. They are not only making great progress in achieving true energy independence, they also are also on the forefront of the renewable energy industry, exporting their products and capabilities to the rest of the world. We are losing out on this while clinging to tar sands and increasingly expensive and dangerous ways of extracting fossil fuels.
Paul and Catherine, Manhattan Beach
I agree with President Obama's decision wholeheartedly and thank you for supporting it as well. This pipeline, if built, will commit the U.S. to the dirtiest oil known by man at a time when we desperately need to re-direct our energy policy to reduce carbon emissions. In addition, most of the oil brought here will not benefit Americans, but will be sold overseas. Thank you again.
Sharon, Laguna Beach
I want to thank you for your stand on the Keystone Pipeline and for holding firm to the fact that this project is not a huge job creator but a disaster for our environment in terms of clean air and clean water. It also puts the wrong emphasis on the need to change to clean energy instead of oil, gas and coal. Those of us in California appreciate all of the support you have given over the years to helping to improve our air and water quality, and the need to embrace clean energy.
Jone, Palo Alto
I Am in disagreement with your decision to approve the rejection of the proposed Keystone project. THis issue has been debated a long time and 60 days is ample time to review/vote. This project would provide much needed employment and energy reserves to maintain our status as a world power; Please review your status on this matter.
Emil, Fresno
Thank you Senator Boxer for agreeing with the Obama Administration's action today regarding Keystone. And thank you for keeping your constituents informed on your position on important matters. I am so thankful that you represent me. Sincerely,
Julie, Los Angeles
I want our nation to move towards clean energy and away from fossil fuels. This will allow us to be less dependent on hostile nations for their petroleum and help in returning our climate to one that has less of a threat from fossil fuel emissions and subsequent climate changes.
Robert, Livermore
I am proud of the courage Pres. Obama has shown in not granting a permit to destroy the middle of our great nation. Thank you for voicing your concerns about this project. I realize it would temporarily help some unemployment throughout the Mid West but the dangers to our ecology out weigh the temporary benefits. Thank you for your leadership.
William, San Jose
I am shocked and deeply saddened by the announced decision to scuttle the Keystone pipeline project. The installed pipeline infrastructure in this country, including Nebraska, is and has been the most extensive, safest network in the world. Keystone would equal jobs and energy from Canada. What's not to like? Electric, solar, alcohol, hydrogen; all together these are not major sources for US energy needs - please consult with DoE for supporting data. As former president Clinton observed, "it's the economy, stupid"
Steven, Antioch
I would like to express our relief in hearing that the President did not buckle to pressure and did block the permit for going forward with this project.
Judy, San Diego
I support Senator Boxer's statement on the Administration's decision not to issue a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline project. Thank you for sending this message to your constituents and for taking a public stand on such an important topic. We stand to lose irreplaceable natural resources, and to adversely impact human health, culture and communities in agreeing too hastily to such an invasive project.
Bettina, Oakland
Back to top